if you believe him and i think he made a compelling statement, not in this parole hearing today but the motion for the habeas motion maybe earlier, he consulted with yale and yale, his then lawyer told him, you know, as long as you didn t use force and that was okay to go do, it really is an outrageous sentence. i agree with jeff s shock oh shock it couldn t happen to a nicer guy, but the fact is is that we have a system and just because the prosecutors didn t get a conviction in l.a., doesn t mean that the prosecutors in nevada are supposed to pay him back because it didn t work in los angeles. i mean, when you think about the amount of time he got on this case and the fact that he s actually done five years, and, you know, the news today is doing four more years on this case, i mean, i ve had clients
habeas motion. basically, you don t see this often, ashleigh. he has to take the stand. he is actually the prosecution s witness basically to say that o.j. is in jail, it s just, that should go on the way it is. you know, you have to question this issue about this half million dollars approximately with no experts being called. really the question about whether he knew about the plea, whether there was an option that he didn t advise his complooin client about. this will be interesting. in the end, i doubt he will prevail about this. sometimes it s about the evidence. in this claim, some of his claim is claims against yale, some have co-counsel saying it didn t go as well as it could have been. i want to bring in paul vercammen, who is covering the case liempblt as we watch yale galanter, he has been on the stand 35 minutes testifying.