because i think the entire concept of independent counsel is so fundamentally flawed. that you inherently have investigation turning into exactly what this has turned into. i think i think deputy attorney general reserve stein, however, is the one who is not doing his job because he demonstrated to my mind utter obliviousness to this mail that is surrounding the mueller investigation. seemingly unable to look at these examples of bias by peter strzok and many, many others. and connect them to what s happening in the investigation. so, when you combine that with the fundamentally unconstitutional nature of an unrestrained independent counsel, i think we are seeing the destruction of the reputation of the justice department and the fbi. i m an alumnus of the justice department. i have worked with fbi
done nothing. that s their practice. that s what their policy calls for. laura: i actually agree with you. i don t think he should have done that either. the fundamental question about this probe is, just given the fact that it s so high stakes, just to have it guy peter strzok weissmann, jeanie rhee they didn t just vote for obama. but when you are someone who worked for the clinton foundation. when you represented ben rhodes as jeannie rhee did. text message how she is defying the president. you are not just a democrat you are defyin deadversary. john bolton, your thoughts on this as a former attorney and watching this from the outside. bob mueller has stellar reputation. republicans built it up and so did democrats. well, i think that it doesn t really matter what bob mueller s reputation is before he becomes an independent counsel.
because i think the entire concept of independent counsel is so fundamentally flawed. that you inherently have investigation turning into exactly what this has turned into. i think i think deputy attorney general reserve stein, however, is the one who is not doing his job because he demonstrated to my mind utter obliviousness to this mail that is surrounding the mueller investigation. seemingly unable to look at these examples of bias by peter strzok and many, many others. and connect them to what s happening in the investigation. so, when you combine that with the fundamentally unconstitutional nature of an unrestrained independent counsel, i think we are seeing the destruction of the reputation of the justice department and the fbi. i m an alumnus of the justice department. i have worked with fbi
on preventing him from being elected by any means necessary. and if that meant applying for a fisa warrant based on a phony dossier in order to spy on the campaign, maybe they would do it. and if it meant deploying the entire mainstream media apparatus into death con one mode, hyperventilating with russian collusion 24/7, they would do it. and today if it requires floating a piec specious store that the president has early on set dementia. they would do it sources later parretted and then retracted by major news organizations. they dual that, too. if it means propagating the idea that don trump jr., jared, and the president were in some conspiracy with the old kgb to throw the election? no problem, whatever it takes. as the former mueller investigator peter strzok
done nothing. that s their practice. that s what their policy calls for. laura: i actually agree with you. i don t think he should have done that either. the fundamental question about this probe is, just given the fact that it s so high stakes, just to have it guy peter strzok weissmann, jeanie rhee they didn t just vote for obama. but when you are someone who worked for the clinton foundation. when you represented ben rhodes as jeannie rhee did. text message how she is defying the president. you are not just a democrat you are defyin deadversary. john bolton, your thoughts on this as a former attorney and watching this from the outside. bob mueller has stellar reputation. republicans built it up and so did democrats. well, i think that it doesn t really matter what bob mueller s reputation is before he becomes an independent counsel.