. will: there is some beautiful pictures this morning of back to school amid the patriotic sunday morning on fox and friends. send in your photos to friends@foxnews.com. happy sunday to both of you. a lot of kids are not starting until next week. pete: still kids have not seen the inside of a school yet, that is true. the last sunday of summer. the last summer before football. pro football. i don t know how it went yesterday. i didn t watch any games. will: sleep is already, i woke up this morning, this will be a rough couple months. i did not go to bed on time. what time did you go to bed. will: it was 10ish, not good for me. because college football kicked off yesterday. yesterday was the big kick off. pete: big day for tight ends. rachel: hats off to you, pete. tighteneds. he brought up my comment. will: you said hats off to you, like getting a tightened award? [laughter] rachel: i don t know anything about that. hats off to you for your mullet. pete: apparently you c
criminal division on january 20th, 2021, the day that president biden was inaugurated. clark started representing hunter biden a month before. will: chris clark was hunter biden s attorney. rachel: correct. will: and also a law partner with rachel: the guy overseeing. will: at doj. pete: acting head of the doj criminal investigation. rachel: exactly. who should be investigating hunter biden. pete: this is how the swamp works on so many levels. i technically work for somebody else. i m the, i m the chief of staff for chuck schumer. my wife happens to be the bureau chief at cnn. rachel: exactly. pete: that is how the swamp works. it is interconnected, we have always plausible deniability. we keep it professional. never work together. in this case we work together, you work with hunter and i pretend to investigate him. why hunter sleeps fine at night even thousand his laptop is out there with criminality.
declassify the report, including the internal documents that confirm this report. he can do that in a minute and he should. now, with dianne feinstein, a lot of people are saying well look, it serves her right because she supported the nsa program. i think she was wrong in supporting the nsa program, but that s really an entirely different thing here. you now have the cia snooping into the committee that s supposed to be overseeing it. that s really by definition a constitutional crisis, because we need to rely on these lawmakers such as they are to police these secret activities, otherwise we ve got nothing. so it s a very serious situation. even before the notion of this guy filing the crime report, this guy was working in the cia division that was involved in the torture activities and now he s the guy overseeing the decision of how to respond to the congressional report on the
soon face a very public and embarrassing trial in the house of representatives. in a stinging ining indictment house ethics committee accuses him of violating ethics rules, that he accepted gifts and other financial wrongdoings. the investigation into rangel involved 41 witnesses, more than 28,000 pages of documents. here are some of them. let s go over to the wall. i want to show you in detail what is in some of these papers and the accusations against rangel. first of all, the money. the committee says that rangel didn t report more than $600,000 on financial disclosure forms, this from the guy overseeing the committee that s supposed to be dealing with taxes. then there s this. take a look. this building, this is the future home of the rangel center for public service at the city college of new york. they named it after charlie rangel. the committee says that rangel violated house rules by pressuring lobbyists and
moment for the democratic congressman. despite efforts to deal with the ethics the 20-term candidate from new york may soon face a public and embarrassing trial in the house of representatives. in a stinging indictment, the house ethics committee accuses the 80-year-old of violating ethics rules. that he accepted gifts and other financial wrongdoings. the ethics committee says the investigation to rangel spent 21 month, involved 41 witnesses and more than 28,000 pages of documents. here are some of them. let s go over to the wall. i want to show you in detail what is in some of these papers and the accusations against rangel. first of all, the money. the committee says that rangel didn t report more than $600,000 on financial disclosure forms, this from the guy overseeing the committee that s supposed to be dealing with taxes. then there s this. take a look. this building, this is the future home of the rangel center for public service at the city college of new york. they named it aft