musk? i want to know if a bunch of other people had to bail it out, nothing near $44 billion. we see every big tech firm laying people off. we see stock market values down in excess of 30 or 40%. that s the counter feedback factual to me. are you building a killer app? i see no evidence of that so far. i agree, by the way. and i think the guy made a really rash decision earlier this year that he spent seven months trying to get out of. i don t know what the value is right now, but it s probably less than it was when he bought it. that s probably a pretty good bet. thank you so much. good to see you both. have a good holiday weekend. meantime, elizabeth holmes back in court this afternoon for her sentencing. holmes was found guilty back in january of four federal fraud charges related to her blood testing start-up. she was convicted of defrauding investors out of nearly
attorney in florida and he negotiated this sweet deal for epstein to be able to take a plea to some minor state charges. so he was looking at the same fact pattern essentially and came up with nothing, whereas southern district prosecutors have come up with this very, very tough indictment. that s a great point you make. if you were listening to geoffrey berman, he was essentially saying the decision made by someone years ago, in his equal position in a different jurisdiction, he was saying the guy made a horribly bad call and ignored the rights of the victims here. i want you to help me because you re a trained lawyer and sometimes hear things in terms of the language. they said in executing a search warrant they found pictures, nude pictures in jeffrey epstein s house that they believe to be underage women. so that tells you these charges are based on this short period of time, four-year period of time back 15 years ago, 17 years ago, the beginning of that period of time, but it so
software and a little bit of hacking know-how can take over a plane but a pilot can grab it right back. gretchen: if this is true, suddenly not taking off your shoes doesn t matter anymore or taking them off. these phones are not going to be allowed on airplanes if this is actually true. the f.a.a. is denying that you would not -bl able to have that phone with you physically. steve: what he says is that the proof of concept he says it s true in concept. it works in concept. would not necessarily interfere with a real airplane. he says he doubts the terrorists would be able to figure out how to use this because they re not that smart. the f.a.a. has responded to gretchen: really? the people involved in 9/11 think the terrorists, unfortunately, were smart. steve: any way, the f.a.a. says that it will not work. they had to respond, it will not work. but the guy made a pretty