president, and there is the supreme leader. how do we talk to the iranian ayatollahs? do we say if you let the guy go, we ll say something good about you? we won t dump on you again? they ll get some international payment in a sense they ll look good? what do you do as an american to get a guy out of this situation? well, you have to understand iran is a very divided society. it has a very divided political system like this country has a very divided political system is. and there are three real centers of power. you the presidency, which is represented by the reformers, the moderates, the people who are negotiating the deal. then you have the judiciary and the security services who are holding his brother, and they are hard-liners. they do not listen to the presidency. and then you have the supreme leader that sort of oversees it all. and you have to try and negotiate and direct your message to the certain parties that are appropriate. so in the case of his brother, and i can unde
i m usually careful w what i say. in terms of what the hard line owners the court over there might react to? it s fair the say i don t want to do anything to hurt jason. of course. our hope is they ll look at the evidence, that folks within the iranian government will have time to look at the evidence and who calls the shot if this is as we all see it as a complete injustice, that there was no spying no reason to believe there was spying. if it was complete injustice, a stunt, a political stunt, international stunt, who would make the call and say we ve done enough. let s let the guy go. who makes the calls? the judges? it doesn t seem that the judges have the power to do that. i don t think people realize there is a give and take there. everybody has their own amount of political power, their chips that they can put in. i think it s a combination there is the judiciary there is the president, and there is the supreme leader. how do we talk to the iranian aye toll las
trump was trying to do his normal take his mccain down and tell us he was no good and he said he is a war hero. he is a war hero. trump was doing his thing and trying to be funny. he got a little laugh and he liked it so he went further. all right. i don t understand the defending trump thing. i didn t support trump until yesterday and now it is like all right, let the guy go. he is chuck johnson with money. that s a twitter thing i guess. i m retweetingtweeting it. bring the pain 2016 is the campaign for our coverage so we ripped off chris rock too. you have to get me a t-shirt. all right. ashley madison hack. you said a website that caters to cheaters promises to
jury and the jury is going lynn, this guy just signed a $40 million all right can contract why would this guy go and kill somebody and ruin his entire life? it s a purely circumstantial case, i can imagine it s pretty difficult. we re getting into deep hours on deliberations. people often thee rise who has the advantage when a jury deliberates this long we looked at some of the high profile deliberations, george zimmerman 16 hours, jodi arias 15 hours, robert blake was 35 hours and he was a kwatsed all of those cases were acquitted except for jodi arias. do you read anything in the tea leaves of the time? no. lynn, this is a lot of information to process. you re talking about, again, a purely circumstantial case and weeks and weeks of evidence. i applaud the jury for taking its time they haven t sent any questions back about the actual murder charges which i don t think we can read into that as well. i think they re methodically
guy in the vehicle. now, what could have happened is if he chased him and this other guy was armed he could have came out behind the officer and killed the officer chasing the other guy. so what you ve got to do as an officer is let that guy go because you got a guy right there in your hands, pull him out of the car, call for backup say i got a guy on the run with his description. trent, to you, as a former police officer and an attorney looking at this right, the charges brought against officer slager are murder charges. what s your take on how the defense is going to go after this in terms of their strategy? are they going to make the defense that this is manslaughter at most because it happened in a moment of passion, in the heat of the moment? and i wonder if maybe you think he s been overcharged here that murder s going to be a tough one to prove here? no look first of all, let me interrupt you really quickly, poppy. i m not a former police officer. although i represented a nu