may sound silly for me to say. lisa and i have been looking at witnesses for 50, 60 years combined. that demeanor is very converse and consistent with somebody who didn t do it. that s number one. number two, when they went and did extensive search warrants. you would normally find some trace of the substance. some computer search for it. something. although just because it is not in his house does not mean he may not have done it somewhere else. megyn: they went in and searched dusky s home. we don t know what they found. on the subject of identifying the witnesses or taking a look and let s listen to the first dusky sound bite. my family knows i don t have anything to do with this. the people that actually know me know i don t have anything to do with this. and, quite frankly, the people that don t know that this is just crazy i m not human lie detector but
silent partner to its continuance and they were signed i am k.c. and i approve this message which is not really the way to do it if you don t want to get caught. it s always helpful to look at the witnesses or in this case the would be defendants. take a being a lot. saw a little bit plaintiff curtis, second sound by the of mr. curtis when you have been charged with something. mr. curtis. watch this. when you have been charged with something and you just you never heard of ricin or whatever. i thought they said rice so i said i don t even eat rice. megyn: okay. so. that is the same man who now says it was dusky, doug. and he says this other guy dusky doesn t like me. he received an email. i have created a band called robo drum and we are going to throw you off the national circuit. some music rivalry. now, look, investigators are going to be able to figure out. first of all his demeanor