there? yes, okay. at this point, roddy bryan is looking back down holmes. what does he do here? he s pulled up his cell phone. his cell phone has been down because he was driving away. when mr. bryan said that he was going home, when he said the guy didn t want to be caught, that s all consistent with this video. now, we can see he s turned around. the question is, ladies and gentlemen, why is he turning around? technically, this is the shorter path back to his house. it may be easier to get in the driveway. you can see the bushes in the video out front. maybe. maybe he s trying to document what s going on. he said that s what he was trying to do. maybe, and that s just me going out on a limb, i m going to
very good. did we play the right portion there, or did we miss it. okay. all right. at this point, roddie bryan is look down, back down holmes. now, what does he do here? he s pulled up his cell phone. his cell phone has been down because he was driving away. when mr. bryan said that he went home, when he said the guy didn t want to be caught, that s all consistent with this video. now, we can see that he s turned around. the question is, ladies and gentlemen, why is he turning around? technically, this is the shorter path back to his house. it may be easier to get in the driveway. you can see the bushes in the video out front, maybe. maybe. he s trying to document what s going on.
states. that was an error in judgment. that s bad enough. if you look beyond that, hopefully we are not seeing an example of politicized science where someone takes a jab at a particular project. i hope that s not what happened here. that s very dangerous for science and democracy. jesse: i agree. some of the reporting suggest it was political. this was around the time donald trump was touting the benefits of hydroxychloroquine, pills, anything remedy at the time. we were scrambling. the reporting suggests this bright guy didn t want to give donald trump any credit. didn t want to give him a talking point.
just a couple of months later decided to fund this drug out of their own money. it s successful now in the u.k. and probably on the brink of authorization here in the united states. that was an error in judgment. that s bad enough. if you look beyond that, hopefully we are not seeing an example of politicized science where someone takes a jab at a particular project. i hope that s not what happened here. that s very dangerous for science and democracy. jesse: i agree. some of the reporting suggest it was political. this was around the time donald trump was touting the benefits of hydroxychloroquine, pills, anything remedy at the time. we were scrambling. the reporth suggests this bright guy didn t want to give donald