morgan. i am thinking about kayleigh and i were little babies, feel bad for mommas on the plane or an elderly parent, god forbid, sitting in over 100 degree heat. you know, during covid the taxpayers put $54 billion into the airline industry. so i don t know what airline this was, this was clearly incredibly poor decision making. i would like to hear from mayor pete. guy and i are on airplanes every week. i would like to know this isn t going to happen tow me, i am not stuck on a plane four hours with my baby in this type of heat. it is incredibly dangerous and serious and worrying. this is where i get really frustrated about how much taxpayer money we hand to companies, no matter who they are. they need to come with a balancing list of demands. i thought we already dealt with tarmac issues. airline by airline they talked about it, i mean from top down. if you get our money, you
guy, i think to myself we are a society that created artificial intelligence can compose essays, mimic voices, we can t figure out air travel. i have to believe the only reason we can t, there are so many scapegoats. everyone says it is the weather, then the blame game starts. airlines point at mayor pete, secretary pete, who is responsible for some of the staffing shortages at the faa, he oversees it. they point back to the airlines to morgan s point that got billion bailouts but didn t step i can like they should. come on, we created ai, let s figure out air travel. for flights landing at u.s. airports, they re required to provide opportunity to safely get off before three hours for domestic flights and four hours for international flights. that to me is the problem with this situation. anyone understands you have plane malfunctions or delays, you have weather events, but not caring enough about people to tell them obviously you need to get off this
first amendment free speech rights or two whistle-blowers who have impeccable records. guy, these are not just people off the street who came in to say what they saw. the whistle-blower carries with it certain legal protections in most settings in our federal government. and it also carries with it an expectation of independence. the fact all these people from different lanes now, the fbi, that they re coming together, what does it tell you? tells me there s something here. i think it is interesting, you mention the whistle-blower designation. we have seen some members of the media put that term in square quotes because they want to diminish credibility preemptively. it is not a hard prediction, but i will make it. tomorrow, house democrats will beat up on whistle-blowers, impugn their integrity, drag them through the mud, rather than dealing with actual things they witnessed because it will be a protection racket against the biden family which is what we are seeing expectedly from
going to capitol hill sounding alarm bells. they re trying to tamp it down. almost like no labels is bernie sanders because that s exactly what they did to him. they tried to corner him. they knew he was going to challenge the establishment. they didn t want to go that route and of course he didn t make it out of the primary. what is it about the democratic establishment that they think is working so well that they want to protect it? do they love biden that much? i don t think so, some of what we are seeing with staff notes coming out of the axios reporting is coming from inside the house. it has to be. how many republicans would have a good lead on who s upset in a private meeting inside the white house? that s coming from inside. so if you have all of that going on, what is it about the establishment they want to protect? they don t have the house and senate, they only have one. so my question is what is joe biden doing behind the scenes to fight back. here s a guy with 50 years o
be expected the way things are supposed to work in department of justice. and i was skeptical, i was a let s see the evidence type of guy on the whole hunter biden probe. but the more we learn, the more smoke there is, i suspect there s fire going back to the president of the united states on national television during the investigation saying that his son did nothing wrong, which is clearly prejudicial, coming from the leader of the executive branch under which the doj falls. might have served him better to say i know nothing. or i have no comment. i don t know if no comment will work, then it ruins cakarine jean-pierre s day. my guess is that democrats are hoping a former president will take some of the shine and spotlight away from the hunter biden investigation with the charges now pending, indictment pending against former president trump. yeah, it is clear we re going to see indictments and news around