again in this country. and so we re going to see how the practical politics of this play out in the next few months. and if it ends up where the demand becomes ban on semiautomatic weapons, ban on so-called assault weapons, you know, it s going to go nowhere. i think there is common ground to achieve things on improving the nic system, improving gun violence restraining orders, and i think there s a motivation to look at some of these things that can be helpful in identifying and keeping folks who are mentally ill out of the nic system and improving the background check system overall. but i do think you re going to see a very clear line. if it gets to the point where they re talking about banning semiautomatic weapons, mag size restrictions, and a ban on ars, you re going to end up with a political fight that s going to motivate the second amendment folks very strongly. they re organized, they re voting, and they re of age to vote for the most part. so there s a sort of political calc
that extend just the nra s financial influence in elections. the membership of the nra and the folks that care passionately about the second amendment, that is a primary voting issue for them. they come out on that issue, and they ve proven it time and time again in this country. and so we re going to see how the practical politics of this play out in the next few months. and if it ends up where the demand becomes ban on semiautomatic weapons, ban on so-called assault weapons, you know, it s going to go nowhere. i think there is common ground to achieve things on improving the nic system, improving gun violence restraining orders, and i think there s a motivation to look at some of these things that can be helpful in identifying and keeping folks who are mentally ill out of the nic system and improving the background check system overall. but i do think you re going to see a very clear line. if it gets to the point where they re talking about banning semiautomatic weapons, mag size res
what we can, that would bring meaningful change right now, universal background checks, would do that. universal back ground checks with the other provisions that the president talked about gun violence restraining orders raising age to 21, banning bump stocks, keeping guns out of hands of people who could do harm to their domestic partner. all of these things, should. do i think he would sign it if it got to the president s desk based on what he said? yes. but he has it keep out of this bill anything that might prevent us from going forward. the assault weapons ban is something i think the american people want us to do. but we have to show that we can get something done right now. this is a way to do it. as i told the president, arming teachers which is something he talked about, is not something that has broad support. should not be in this legislation. and if he is prepared to back off on that, and we can do universal background checks, that would be showing my constituents back hom
congressional howie: the president was talking about dealing with the mentally ill. he said take the guns first. mollie: mike pence is talking about gun violence restraining orders. if you are worried about someone committing violence with a gun, you can get a restraining order. then trump talked and said let s get rid of due process. that s a horrific thing to hear from a president. that s what supports the narrative that he s a tyrant. yet the media who is so quick to speak out. they didn t even notice these violations of the second amendment or constitutional protections. capri: they latched on to the
president s threatening back. this trade wars and dividing us from our allies makes no sense. fair trade is important, jake. and that s why this whole mechanism of not allowing bureaucrats to slow the process down and if shomebody cheats us by the time they get called on it, the jobs are loss. we need an expedited process. the press met with lawmakers today when he said this for gun violence restraining orders. take a listen. to go to court would have taken a long time. you can do what you re saying but take the guns first, go through due process second. you have proposed a gun violence real estate straining order in ohio which would allow the restraining order but only after due process, after a court ruling. what do you think of president trump saying take the guns first and then do due process? it s not the way we re going to do it. i don t think that s where this would ultimately pass. there s a lot of argument around