After the school massacre in Newtown, everyone has been putting out proposals for how to reduce gun violence. President Obama created an inter-agency task force. The NRA asked for armed guards in every school. And now economists are weighing in with their own, number-heavy approaches. First, here’s a recent paper (pdf) by Duke’s Philip Cook…
Under the phony guise of 'making America safer,' a loony House Democrat is proposing a new anti-gun measure that is almost certain to create a huge black market for the country's [.]
services to fight this in court, the city can still be on the hook for a legal fee that is potentially damaging if the court ruled it is unconstitutional. secondly, some data doesn t support the premise for the latest doj study says while gun sales are up, gun crimes fell 27% in 2020. this is not fair to a person that is legally done nothing wrong who owns a gun. to basically be reprimanded. you have to go after the criminal that is stealing the gun and committing the crime. some insurance policies cover gun accidents. others require owners buy additional insurance. roughly $25 gun tax will pay for mental health and social services. lease will not go door-to-door they say but owners may lose their guns if they can t produce proof of insurance. i don t think we will be doing proactive work to try to track down people that haven t paid their insurance, but if we had an interaction with somebody that had a gun, it would be an