said on the ruling, the justification of this ruling is this. to justify a firearm regulation, the government must demonstrate that the regulation is consistent with the nation s historical tradition of firearm regulation. pretty broad new standard with gun standards. the magazine ban, about ten states plus the district of columbia has those. are those in the tradition of gun regulation that goes back more than 100 years? it s unlikely the court would find that. those could be targeted by gun rights organizations to try to get those bans ruled unconstitutional. and then the red flag law. u.s. congress and president biden to encourage more states to have red flag laws, but that doesn t mean that gun rights organizations think they re constitutional and they may go back to court to see if that
ignore the hypocrisy of the conservative majority, between yesterday and today. today the court praises itself as a great defender of democracy. it says, we are so wonderful, we are turning this issue to the people. where it belongs. they and their elected representatives can sorted out it is not for us to decide. yesterday they, said actually, the people cannot decide on matters of gun regulation. that is not a topic that is legitimate subject of legislation, by the elected representatives. instead it is unlikely judges who will decide when and how individuals can carry guns. deploying with i. consider to be an extremely weak and dilute ontario approach to historical analysis. in order to find the so-called right to self address that allegedly encompasses a right to carry arms in public. which was broadly banned and restricted within the second amendment was ratified at the state. so i think it is very clear
one democratic strategist tweeting about sometimes mass shooters wear robes and sometimes don t have a gun. then the out of work espn analyst keith olbermann, poor keith called for the supreme court to be dissolved. then went on to shout profanities at the justices and even referred to amy coney barrett as a paralegal. joe biden is also upset about the ruling, the guy who left $80 billion in the most sophisticated weaponry of war and at the hands the taliban, doesn t trust his fellow law-abiding americans to have a firearm. the guy who also told his wife, if i m not here and there is any trouble, take the shot gun and shoot twice. take a look. i think it s a bad decision, i think it is not reasoned accurately, i m disappointed. we are disappointed by the supreme court s ruling today. the second amendment as you heard the president say, is not absolute, and permits common sense gun regulation.
sense gun regulation. we just see some very disturbing news from washington that the supreme court of the united states of america has stripped away the statemerif new york s right and responsibility to protect its citizens with a decision which we are still digesting, which is frightful in its scope. but this decision has made h everyas single one of us less safe from gun violence. the fact that the court is coming down with its decision to death and i worry that it undermines the legitimacy of the court and seems i don t even have the words it seems stupid to know it s worse than that . it s worse than that it s not even if e it is and i know it s soso it s such a middle finger o new york . many of us are deeply concerneda and troubled by the supreme court s ruling today. i believe
we had shannon watts at our signing. we want to make the decisions locally to respond in a way where we are taking action to save lives. alito, in his decision on guns yesterday, wrote that our holding decides nothing about who may lawfully possess a firearm, or the requirements that must be met to buy a gun, nor does it decide anything about the kinds of weapons that people may possess. in effect saying this does not relate to every gun regulation, like those that rhode island just passed. but i wonder do you and your attorney general believe those lines and are you protectively preparing for court challenges? we will protect the right for our legislation. our speaker, our senate president, came together, similar what happened in the senate yesterday and the federal level, but on the state level. and we intend to make sure that we re doing everything we can to keep the people in the state of rhode island safe and if we need