so loyal to this president take away from this? well, i think that the challenge is there s going to be maybe what republicans should do and what republicans will do which is what we ve seen over the past couple of years play out. there s been a lot of serious questions raised. not just in nikki hailey s book, but throughout the past couple of years and we ve seen some of what kelly and tillerson were thinking about play out in the situation with turkey and syria. where lives have been lost and troubling policy has been inacted. but ultimately if you look at the quote from general kelly, i think joe would agree when you work on statements, umt to have a very strong statement but sometimes you don t say now and that s a very strong statement that doesn t say no. kelly said something similar in fact along those lines when he insinuated that left to he has his own devices, the president will commit impeachable acts, listen to what he says he told the president as he was leaving office
license to operate from the last abortion clinic in the state. len late last night more than 24 hours after williams admitted the existence of that spreadsheet under oath, more than 24 hours after reporters started calling his office from all over the country to ask questions about it the missouri state government put out a statement about it. quote irresponsible reporting has led to false claims that dr. randall williams tracks the menstrual cycles of women in planned parenthood. nothing in the testimony could in any way be cited to support this false claim. the state gumt of missouri says nothing could be cited to support this false claim. state health director randall williams doesn t track the menstrual cycles of women seeking abortions at planned parenthood, no way, right, dr. williams? the last column there includes the department s calculation of the woman s last normal period, right?
and believes and will do that through the might of the milt. and they say they possess no chemical weapons, russian foreign ministry labelled it a hoax. should the u.s. wait for evidence that chemical weapons were used and trace it to assad before conducting a strike. we have pretty definitive evidence and i don t want to get into the details but i know what capabilities we have. when on the one hand russia said that u.s. special forces in a false flag operation did this, and then say there was no use of chemical weapons, and then block the umt n. attempt to investigate whether there was chemical weapons, i think there is no doubt the russians know there was and they re complicit. we can t take anything the russians say to their word and they like to play to the domestic audience and some bots on twitter or people willing to believe the crazys conspiracy theories like a false flag operation.
point have you to have a national consensus first before you can substitute something like this. how did the gun buy back, it seems like it s still a rolling program. how that worked and how did you entice people. how much money did they get in. it was an equation of the original weapon price. if you say there is no gun culture. we are a rural country. my state of queensland a rural part, two-thirds of us live outside the cities. so that s where we live and have our being. and so there is a culture which says i may need a rifle on my farm to deal with, you know, a wild animals or something that will affect the stock or rip things to pieces. that s fine. but if you ask your average farmer or your average sporting shooter who shoots clay targets and whatever, do i need a semi a umt? even those guys, in my country, including my father and those
doubt. you mean jay-z s first album? oh no. i got you. i got confused. i was very pleased with the evaluation. i think it was right spot. on. and one more point of view and then i want to go to the obstruction conversation which we didn t focus on. is it good for a lawyer to see what we saw, i noticed some of our jurors repeating your thesis. there is a debate over whether collusion combined with conspiracy is a crime but i heard he jurors repeat that collusion is not a crime. what i do when i argue in front of jurors or an appeals court torsion give them pithy, easily understood concepts that make make their own. i try never to tell a jury this is what you should believe. i want them to come to the aha moment and have it their, a umt so it is harder to talk they will out of it when the jury is alone in the jury room and somebody is trying to persuade them.