i was sexually active. i was not sexually deviant, and because i was sexually active, that turned in for them to sexually deviant. guilianio menini had his three killers behind bars. he would now use the press to help prove his case. the press in italy doesn t have any boundaries. that s where the word paparazzi comes from. tools to fight it. to investigate it. .prosecute it. and stop criminals. our senior medicare patrol volunteers. are teaching seniors across the country. .to stop, spot, and report fraud. you can help. guard your medicare card. don t give out your card number over the phone. call to report any suspected fraud. we re cracking down on medicare fraud. let s make medicare stronger for all of us.
allegations against him. nobody focused on him. the treel was a long, slow process. the media constantly milked the emotions of the public. the prosecutor and media tells wonderful stories and would get up and say amanneda did this, amanda did that, and they would just write it down as though it happened in front of their eyes. the italian justice system and the italian media system is like a two-headed monster, and both of them need to get fed. even with all its advantages, the prosecution s case lacked hard physical evidence against amanda and raffaele. they kept trying to find evidence to place amanda and raffaele in the actual room where the crime was committed, and they haven t been able to do that. there s only two pieces of evidence that supposedly ever connected her to this crime, and neither one of those connect her. the first was a kitchen knife found in raffaele s apartment. in the case of the knife, the media mantra on this, the thing they kept repeating ove
always go by what the prosecutor says. actually, they could have had some closure long ago if he had just pursued the most logical trail. i don t think the prosecution has admitted that through the objectivity of their evidence they can conclude who participated and who did not. the fact that it has been put out there for so long that i may or may not have had something to do with the murder they can t let go of. the idea that someone knows what happened or was a part of what happened and isn t saying anything 12k3 r and isn t being held responsible is maddening. i understand that. but it s not but i m not responsible for what happened.
room. meredith may have come home and surprised him. maybe he was lying in wait. i hate to say it, but it s kind of the garden variety one guy kills tries to rape and rob girl case. in contrast to rudy guede s incriminating dna, amanda s defense team also set out to prove that the dna found on the knife allegedly meredith s, did not implicate amanda or raffaele. they actually had independent experts come in, and they were absolutely appalled by the way that dna was collected and tested. those independent experts said the evidence is contaminated. it s not admissible. it s compromiseded. they thought was meredith s dna, was not dna at all. it was nothing. it didn t match her in any way, shape, or form. the prosecutor trying to rebut that somehow amanda went back and cleaned up the dna. it s a ridiculous notion.
what ended up being prosecutor menini s contention was that somehow amanda ordered the murder from the next room because that was the only way you could explain how she was involved but there was none of her dna at the scene. it was remarkable it didn t even pass the giggle test, but that was what the prosecutor was reduced to. without real evidence the prosecution had not a case on amanda s presumed bad character, but was merely looking guilty enough to send her to prison for life? for all of their theories about my personality and my behavior, there is nothing that links me to this murder. i am not present at the crime scene. i m just not.