dr. jeff kinard. you may have a class with him. he is the chair of our history and political science program here at guilford technical community college. what you may not know about dr. kinard is that he is a military historian, an expert in military history. he has published at least four books on anything from weaponry, weaponry from the civil war, revolutionary war. he collects a host of artifacts which he has brought and will share with us today. he is a phd, earned his doctorate from texas christian university in fort worth. what year? it was a while ago. but he is an expert. if you get an opportunity take a class with him, take a class. we are going to continue to discuss the civil war. thankfully for dr. kinard, we get to look at the aspect of weaponry and its impacts on the war. without further ado, i will hand the class over to dr. kinard. dr. kinard: thank you. the theme for today s lecture is going to be about technology of warfare. a lot of our classes we deal wi
this is american history tv. exploring our nation s past every weekend on c-span 3. on lectures in history, guilford technical community college professor jeff class aboutes a civil war weaponry and shares artifacts such as muskets, carbines and revolvers. he describes advances such as breach loading and rifle barrels allowed soldiers to fire faster in with more accuracy. all right, guys. welcome to class. today, as i talked about a little bit earlier this week, we have a special lecture here. dr. jeff kinard. you may have a class with him. he is the chair of our history and political science program here at guilford technical community college. what you may not know about dr. kinard is that he is a military historian, an expert in military history. he has publish at least four books on anything from weaponry, weaponry from the civil war, revolutionary war. of artifacts host which she has brought and will share with us today. hisis a phd, earned doctorate from texas chris
welcome to class. today, as i talked about a little bit earlier this week, we have a special lecturer here. dr. jeff kinard. you may have a class with him. he is the chair of our history and political science program here at guilford technical community college. what you may not know about dr. kinard is that he is a military historian, an expert in military history. he has published at least four books on anything from weaponry, weaponry from the civil war, revolutionary war. he collects a host of artifacts which he has brought and will share with us today. he is a phd, earned his doctorate from texas christian university in fort worth. what year? it was a while ago. but he is an expert. you get an opportunity take a class with him, take a class. we are going to continue to discuss the civil war. thankfully for dr. kinard, we get to look at the aspect of weaponry and its impacts on the war. without further ado, i will hand the class over to dr. kinard. dr. kinard: the theme f
The dress that dates back to the british and the burning of washington. Susan the trunk was a large. Arriage trunk inside it was roller printed cotton fabric and tools. Inside this trunk work downs, a , silkmarket turban slippers, odd pieces of fabric and muslin, and the kinds of treasures that may be any of us , mementos of our past. They all belonged to Dolley Madison. We are at the greensboro historical museum. We are going to talk about our Dolley Madison collection. Ourey was the wife of fourth president , James Madison, and probably one of our most popular first ladies. 1768 to arn may 20, quaker family, and lived and American Life which took her eventually to become one of the most Popular Figures in early american history. Brothers and sisters and after a stay at a farm in tilford county, they , eventuallyginia moving to philadelphia when dolley was about 15. It was there that she married her first husband, a young attorney, and had a two sons and experienced the tragedy of los
Congressional districts here in the North Carolina Congressional Districts, the issues presented are actually quite distinct. With respect to the Congressional District it is ths different from both the houseats delegate districts in the previous case because this is not a district that was with an intent to create a majority minority rather with respect to Congressional District 12 it was a pivotal role. If that sounds familiar it is the same dynamic that was before the court. In reversing the court on the standard concluded when the state says this is a politicalaf joe race did not predominate over the growing in the district and that is essentially the same dynamic before the court now with one difference this is easier to reverse because even before the court gets to the standard of review, there is a legal editor here was created y my friends on the other side and the District Courts failure to abide by the teaching. I think it was as clear as it could have been that in a case whe