commission on a unanimous bipartisan basis issued a record recommending changes for sentences to nonproduction child pornography, which is the subject at hand offenses because of widespread concern among judges and other stakeholders. for example, 70% of surveyed judges said the guideline ranges for possession receipts were too high. notably the report was supported by every member of the commission. i believe the question which the senator from texas is referring to was part of the proceedings that led to that commission report, unanimous bipartisan basis commission report. mr. chairman, very briefly, i would ask unanimous consent that the books i referenced be entered into record. no objection. senator koonce? thanks. judge jackson, good to be with you. good to be with you, senator. i d like to take a few
bipartisan basis issued a report recommending changes to sentencing for non-production child pornography which is the subject at hand. offenses because of widespread concern among judges and other stake holders, for example, 70% of surveyed judges said the guideline ranges for possession receive offenses were too high. 71% said the mandatory minimums were too high. notably the report was supported by every member of the commission. i believe the question the senator of texas was referring was part to have the proceedings that led to that report. unanimous bipartisan basis commission report. very briefly, i would ask unanimous consent the books i mentioned be entered into the record. without objection. senator coons. thank you. judge jackson, good to be with you. good to be with you, senator. i d like to take a few
bipartisan basis issued a report recommending changes to sentencing for non-production child pornography, which is the subject at hand. offenses because of widespread concern among judges and other stakeholders, for example. 70% of surveyed judges said the guideline ranges for possession offenses were too high. 71% said the mandatory minimums were too high. notably, the report was supported by every member of the commission. i believe the question which the senator was texas was referring to was part of the proceedings that led to that commission report. unanimous bipartisan basis commission report. mr. chairman, very briefly i would ask unanimous consent that the books i referenced be entered into the record. ? without objection. senator coons. thank you, chairman. ranking member grassley. judge jackson, good to be with you. good to be with you, senator. i d like to take a few minutes, if i could, and just give you a chance to address
0 stems back decades and that is concerning. you wrote your note on the harvard law review on sex crimes. your note is your major academic work on the law review and yours is entitled prevention versus punishment: towards a principled distinction in the restraint of released sex offenders. and in it you argue, and i quote, a recent spate of legislation purports to regulate released sex offenders by requiring them to register with local law enforcement officials, notify community members of their presence, undergo dna testing and submit to civil commitment for an indefinite term. at many courts and commentators herald these laws as valid regulatory measures, others reject them as punitive enactments that violate the rights of individuals who have already been sanctioned for their crimes. under existing doctrine the constitutionality of sex offender statutes depends upon their characterization as essentially preventative rather than punitive. and what you go on to explain is if they
0 activism and advocacy as it concerns sexual predators that stems back decades and that is concerning. you wrote your note on the harvard law review on sex crimes. your note is your major academic work on the law review prevention versus punishment toward a principled distinction in the restraint in it you argue and i quote a recent spate of legislation reports to release sex offenders by requiring them to notify local law enforcement and submit to civil commitment for indefinite term. many say it violates the rights of individuals that have been sanctioned for their crimes. the contusionalty of sex offender statutes depends on their characterization as essentially preventsive rather than punitive. you explain if they re viewed an punitive, they re unconstitutional. if they re preventative, they are not. throughout the course of your note, you argue they should be viewed as punitive and therefore unconstitutional. indeed in the second to last page you go through each of those for ca