Weve already been directed to use that model. We now have to go to the court to access the data. Is the government no longer collecting located . The data continues to be provided to us. Now to access the data we have to go to the court to get permission to access the data. Why continue to gather the data is both administration and the and i dont think this is the best approach to . Guess im confused because i dont think ive heard the president or the di said access to the data is not a value. I think what ive heard is the question gets to be who should hold the data it the president directed in his remarks will continue to implement the program right now while Congress Works to how well make longterm changes. We will do that on a 90 day interval. So every 90 days we have to go back and ask for continued permission. One last comment. I know amount of time. If the administration believes, and understand that they do, that the better model is to go to a paradigm where Companies Hold onto
Quorum call quorum call quorum call s mr. Chambliss mr. President , i ask that the quorum call be dispensed with and i be allowed to speak in morning business. The presiding officer without objection. Mr. President , i rise today along with my colleague from New Hampshire s been very focused, as havere i, on this issue of the release of detainees from guantanamo and the fact that we know that not only are there dangerous individuals there that should not be released, but we also know that these individuals are returning to the fight and theyre scheming, planning and intending to do harm to america and americans. So i want to visit this issue again and i want to start off just by saying that its well founded in our nations history that the United States has the authority to hold enemy combatants until the end of hostilities in order to prevent their return to the battlefield. For the past several years, each National Defense authorization act that has been signed into the law by the pre
Responsible for 45 emissions. Europe, 15 . Altogether, 60 emissions. It is a political commitment at the highest level. This would show the responsible leadership level 228 European Countries plus United States plus china. This is in terms of numbers. Paquette, this, i believe, china being a part of the game. This will inject a very Strong Political laments and to be part of this process. It can be more and more difficult for the countries who are other significant emitters who will not be a part of the coalition of finding a solution. It will be very difficult for them not to be part of the countries who want to find the solution. And these countries are the 28 European Countries, europe and china. Number three, i believe the key issue here is china. In europe and i believe in north america and asia, many people who find a solution to Climate Change say and will say we can do a lot of things to reduce emissions. But if china doesnt move, we cannot find a solution. So why should we pun
[laughter] thank you and i will be quick. I want to add a sense of urgency here. The ukrainian economy is down. [inaudible] than that we need to do on our side is assess prices in the top 10 of gdp and it is an interesting system. What the west needs to do is to spend this on top of the 7 billion and it makes this for five or six years. We will deliver the extra copies to your institute. [laughter] asking the panelists to wrap up, whatever theyd like to say, steve, we will start with you about a 30 billiondollar western assistance package to what your point is. We have written two pieces in the last two weeks which lay out the western response and want the ukrainians have responsibility for and i commend them. They are available on the Peterson Institute website and i agree with every word that he has written. And i do want to answer the point about military assistance. First of all with a caviar and the less it is talked about the better. But here we are. Second, there are the house a
Fazel, a member of the the taliban five. He commanded main force opposing the u. S. Backed Northern Alliance in 2001. Served as chief of staff for the army under the taliban and accused of war crimes. One of the taliban commanders on the ground said it was the best news he had heard in 12 years. He said his return is is like pouring 10,000 taliban vit fighters into the battle on the jihad. Now, they have the right lion to lead them in the right moltment in victory. I think the American People deserve to know whether any of the taliban five have reengageded. Im glad youve confirmed today there are returning after the year to afghanistan. In other words there arent Additional Information on the release unless youre telling me they are. Thats my question for the people who have been released in the last months by the administration and id just like to ask you, with some of them on november 5th of 2014 one of the detainees was transferred to kuwait. What we know about him publicly that i c