l.l.c. the l.l.c. was created to enter into this agreement. there was a quid pro quo. consideration on both sides, and now she s going to break that agreement, sn agreement, okay? pardon me. i m not a lawyer. i don t understand. if he s entering into this agreement for this llc, why have david denison on there at all. if david denison is not involved in this llc, and clearly he is involved some way. he s representing the llc and david denison and that s ethically a problem, isn t it? no, he s a third party beneficiary to this deal. so somebody can make a contract for me, in my name without informing me? if there s a logical third party beneficiary. and by the way so my agent, my tv agent, who
name without informing me, someone could do that? well, if there is a logical third party beneficiary here, clearly michael cohen was acting of the best interest of the third party. my tv agent who has an llc. can make a contract with my name on it? this is not a general rule. every set of circumstances is different and in this particular set of circumstances, there was nothing wrong. by the way, the only person that should be complaining about this is dd. if it is unethical, it would be dd under that contract bringing the action. these contracts, non-disclosures let me bring jeff in. i think david is clearly right. there is something illegal that went on here. the question is what did donald