has a whole lot of money to defend against these cases. i think that what is so interesting about the indictment is that she takes a lot of time, most of the indictment is laying out these rico charges, this criminal enterprise. and not saying that it was in silos. she is saying that it is all connected. the fake electors, the tampering of the election, evidence in county. the calls to state officials, the misinformation and disinformation that was shared at the legislative hearings, that they are all connected. so you can t sever donald trump from rudy giuliani or anybody else. eastman, and all of these others, that they all were working together and calling each other and texting each other, innocent until proven guilty, but i think it s going to be harder to try to sever
Rosmorport signs contract with Inter RAO-Engineering on construction of international terminal âPionerskoyeâ
The contractor to complete construction by 20 December 2022
Inter RAO-Engineering has been contracted by FSUE Rosmorport to complete the construction of the international freight/passenger terminal “Pionerskoye” in the Kaliningrad Region, says press center of the Federal Marine and River Transport Agency (Rosmorrechflot). The project is foreseen by the federal project “Sea Ports of Russia” under the Comprehensive Plan for Modernization and Expansion of Core Infrastructure (CPMI) until 2024. The works will be financed by the federal budget (in 2020 – RUB 723.6 million, in 2021 – RUB 3.1 billion, in 2022 – RUB 2.16 billion). In December 2020, Inter RAO - Engineering LLC (member of Inter RAO Group, Moscow) was announced the winner of FSUE Rosmorport’s tender for construction of port infrastructure in the seaport of Kaliningrad - international
you probably wouldn t be making that argument right now? you are precisely correct. it s one of the issues that one of the justices raised about being honest with the american people when you pass a bill. if you recall, greta, when the bill was first drafted, it was categorized as a tax, they eliminated the word tax and replaced it with penalty because congress didn t want to have to be subject to casting a vote, imposing a massive tax increase, especially on americans make less than $250,000 a year. greta: now something that i think will bite the government in the rear end, tomorrow s issue on the severability clause, the clause that is not in this legislation. so as i understand it correct me if i am wrong because the clause is not in the legislation, should the supreme court say that the mandate is unconstitutional, they can t sever it out and let the rest of the statute be alive and well. instead, the entire statute s going to have to go. right. here again, an early versi
you probably wouldn t be making that argument right now? you are precisely correct. it s one of the issues that one of the justices raised about being honest with the american people when you pass a bill. if you recall, greta, when the bill was first drafted, it was categorized as a tax, they eliminated the word tax and replaced it with penalty because congress didn t want to have to be subject to casting a vote, imposing a massive tax increase, especially on americans make less than $250,000 a year. greta: now something that i think will bite the government in the rear end, tomorrow s issue on the severability clause, the clause that is not in this legislation. so as i understand it correct me if i am wrong because the clause is not in the legislation, should the supreme court say that the mandate is unconstitutional, they can t sever it out and let the rest of the statute be alive and well. instead, the entire statute s going to have to go. right. here again, an early versi
question let s not talk about it as healthcare. this case is about liberty not healthcare. the bill is about healthcare, but the violation of the constitution would take place if they were ordering you to buy chevrolets, it s the same thing. but this bill does not have what is called a severabilty clause. you can t sever out one part that might be unconstitutional and keep the rest. if it is found to be unconstitutional as virginia says it is the whole bill falls, the whole thing. megyn: which is why you re going to see the obama administration fight vigorously to try to get a favorable ruling as this case goes forward, because now the judge is just basically giving you the green light to litigate the case. what do you expect the decision on the merits from this judge, in the fall? the federal government has to answer 13 days from today and summary judgment is already set for oral argument on october 18th, and if the judge