Finally, its in the decision as to whether donald trump can be excluded pushed out from the ballots. In some states is in, and weve learned that it was a 9 to nothing decision ruling that donald trump can be on. The ballad in colorado and other states, eastern justices during the oral argument, seemed very skeptical of the idea that one state could decide for the nation whether donald trump was an insurrection us, and it was therefore disqualified under this 150 year old provision. So so, so let me take you through it a little bit. So what the court is saying essentially, is that if the president is to be excluded from for past actions, from an election, no matter how bad those action may be or may not be, it should not be up to the states. Youre saying it should be up to congress to make a National Decision like that, you know what . Probably right. Because imagine what would happen if democratic states or republican states in the future for that matter, got a chance to eliminate the
The finding of a media, its not just a r d a they found press dvd or in, in a National Broadcast or even a chinese, d, v, z c, d, v a is no longer available in prison. They didnt make a political binding older on it, but they just managed to lose their application for the renewal of that license. So just trying not rushing around the maybe all those kellys, youre in south america, they, you just cant get it right. And then the reason is pretty simple. If you think about it too many people were watching these Television Channels too many people were watching audi, not just in for them, but even more so in germany. Thats right. Are the was closed started because too many of the public were watching it. Hows up for freedom . While i rose up, this is as always, is going to have your pleasure. What and company here on, on see rick sanchez is on doris impact. Next i will be back to now the, in the time of buddy im rick sanchez. And im here to tell you that after being a journalist and the ne
Do not support that they will pay me basically double the amount that we agreed on and they would repost my video onto their feed which obviously so essentially latifa just break down what i cuz might have missed something so this lady is saying that as influencer part of her you know livelihood is to post videos to work with brands and um she did so and she was due to post something and get compensated as was her contract but because of her support for the Palestinian People because she had attended a protest and she had posted pictures on her personal account, the brand decided not to work with her any longer um but then changed their mind and actually tried to bribe her, they said that if you take down your post and you publicly declared that you do not support palestinians, we will pay you double, now this is a nameless brand at this stage, but from what shes described, it is a brand with a massive fling, and because of the work that she has done with other brands before, we can in
She actually creates a balm using spell effects and and shes getting ready and shes talking about as we saw a Palestinian Woman whos getting ready with uh with makeup that she has to pull from the rubber shes making jokes so um racist and islamophobic jokes regarding the the hijab the fact that youre a nonmuslim woman jab and to exaggerate features and and makeup, its what weve seen it before, weve definitely seen this before, but the inhumanity of this influence thinking that it is a funny thing to do, to make fun of someone who has had to pick their decisions from under the rouble in order to just get ready for a day, shows you really how low in the chain palestinians are um in the israeli mindset, weve seen this with their politicians, weve seen talking about us as animals, so this has been. Surprise, this is hate being filtered from the top down. All right, uh, very briefly, theres a third influence of video that looks at this, were just going to quickly skim on this one, so from u
The committee at any time and i recognize myself or my Opening Statement. Welcome to todays hearing which will focus on the impact of the ncaa name, image and likeness policy across the College Athletics. I would like to thank all our witnesses here today for their time as we discussed this potential issue. For the first one to 15 years of the ncaa government of a College Sports the individual College Athletes had no legal rights turn a profit from their athletic performance was entitled to nothing gun room and board, meals and education. In 2021 after a series of court cases force the ncaa to change the policies College Athletics rod to monetize their name, image and likeness overnight without affecting their playing eligibility resulting sanctions against that university. We are still the early years of this new era. He think is important to take a look at the positive and negative consequences of the drastic change in policy. We will start the obvious good. Student athletes cannot p