Thank you, scott sanchez, planning department. I will be brief and wanted to note we reviewed the most community revised plans were submitted to the board of appeals on january 10, 2013. The date on the revision set is january 7th,2013 and these comply with the planning code and im available. Im sorry they do comply . They do comply. That is correct. Thank you. Is there any Public Comment . Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is submitted. Commissioner i reviewed the drawings and they reflect what i remember of the proposed changes at that point in time and im prepared to move to uphold the permit and condition it on the documentation that has been provided to reflect the changes. Is that the appropriate it sounds like what you want to do is grant the appeal and uphold the permit on the condition that it is revised, to reflect the changes. And i would ask just that plan set be noted by date. Submitted to the board, which is january 10, 2013. Okay. So moved. Im inclined to move in th
Again this shows at the fourth floor, the setback. That concludes my comments. Thank you commissioners. Thank you. We can hear from the appellants now. Go ahead. Mr. Stewart good evening members of the board, my name is Dennis Stewart and im a [raert ] round the corner. I would like to make two brief appeals on this one, as i think the board has already decided, but for the Public Record i do wish to reiterate for the reasons set forth in previous testimony. This building even with the small reductions in height is inconsistent to the departments codes, with regard to its compatibility with the neighborhood. I want to say it for the Public Record this is not compatible with the neighborhood and sets a bad precedent for future decisions that will be based on a comparison with this building, assuming that you approve it. The second is a procedural objection to this, which i raised at the last meeting. And that is i take with due respect to commissioner honda, i do take umbridge with the
Because indeed, Zephyr Realty is involved. Thank you, mr. Sanchez. Thank you, scott sanchez, planning department. I will be brief and wanted to note we reviewed the most community revised plans were submitted to the board of appeals on january 10, 2013. The date on the revision set is january 7th,2013 and these comply with the planning code and im available. Im sorry they do comply . They do comply. That is correct. Thank you. Is there any Public Comment . Seeing none, commissioners, the matter is submitted. Commissioner i reviewed the drawings and they reflect what i remember of the proposed changes at that point in time and im prepared to move to uphold the permit and condition it on the documentation that has been provided to reflect the changes. Is that the appropriate it sounds like what you want to do is grant the appeal and uphold the permit on the condition that it is revised, to reflect the changes. And i would ask just that plan set be noted by date. Submitted to the board, w
Revised, not the permit to demolish. Do you want to separate votes . I think you can do one vote. Were upholding the site permit with the revised plan dates january 10. On that motion, from commissioner fung, president hwang . Aye. Thank you. Commissioner hurtado is absent. Vice president lazarus . Aye. And commissioner honda . Aye. Thank you. The vote is 40 and the demolition permit suprahold asis and the site performance is uphold with those revised plans. Thank you. Calling item no. 7, appeal no. 1214 1 gration wu versus the department of building inspection, subject property at 42 lapp hamm way. Appealing the imposition of a penalty on november 13th, 2012tor Construction Work Done would you tell us a permit. Good evening. This is my first time to remodel the house. I hired a contractor. And i followed his instructions and i didnt know he didnt get a permit. Right now i already got the Building Permit and im looking for the electricity and the Plumbing Contractors so i can get those
Revised, not the permit to demolish. Do you want to separate votes . I think you can do one vote. Were upholding the site permit with the revised plan dates january 10. On that motion, from commissioner fung, president hwang . Aye. Thank you. Commissioner hurtado is absent. Vice president lazarus . Aye. And commissioner honda . Aye. Thank you. The vote is 40 and the demolition permit suprahold asis and the site performance is uphold with those revised plans. Thank you. Calling item no. 7, appeal no. 1214 1 gration wu versus the department of building inspection, subject property at 42 lapp hamm way. Appealing the imposition of a penalty on november 13th, 2012tor Construction Work Done would you tell us a permit. Good evening. This is my first time to remodel the house. I hired a contractor. And i followed his instructions and i didnt know he didnt get a permit. Right now i already got the Building Permit and im looking for the electricity and the Plumbing Contractors so i can get those