what does the president, what s the white house perspective? the president s interest as previously discussioned do not violate the clause for reasons that length that the justice of department filing enumerate in their friday night filings with respect to the crew lawsuit which was the first one. this lawsuit today is another iteration of the case that was filed by that group crew filed by the same lawyers. so it s not hard to conclude that partisan politics may be one of the motivations behind it. the suit was filed by two democratic attorney generals. the lawyers driving the suit are advocacy group with partisan ties. it started with a press conference as opposed to filing it which is interesting. the suit challenges the business transactions that everyone from penny pritsker and others have engaged in while in office. i think we ll continue to move to dismiss this case in the normal course of business. i wanted to just two questions. but first why leave open this
enough to affect election, other than a shift in public opinion. reporter: micoff says that public opinion can shift quickly, because he points out that o donnell was trailing until the last few days when she swept in front of him. and literally, he says, anything can happen between o donnell and chris coons. has chris coons had anything at all to say about o donnell s financial situation? i asked a campaign aid for coons about that this afternoon and he said, no, we will not weigh in on this at all and focus in on the issues that the campaign finances are for her to deal with and they have emphatically said they have no contact with this group crew, and no allegations for them. and we will be moderating a debate october 14th in delaware between these two senate candidates a and that debate
t the emollients clause in the lawsuit? what is the president s position on this. the president s actions does not violate the emollients clause and it is enumerated in the friday night filing. this lawsuit today is just another iteration of a case that was filed by that group crew filed, actually, by the same lawyers. so it s not hard to conclude that partisan politics may be one of the motivations behind the suit. the suit was filed by two democratic attorney jegenerals. the lawyers driving the suit have partisan ties. the suit challenges the sort of business transaction that everyone from penny pritzker, who served in the last administration, and others engaged in office, so i think we ll continue to move to dismiss this case in the normal course of business. thanks, sean. i just wanted two questions.