bang, bang, bang. that was different than what was discussed and a lot of ground fighters reached out to me during the trial saying i would never sit up straight on top of somebody like that. i would never grab him around the shoulders. i would be grabbing his head. the question to you two is did you think it was at all interesting there seemed to be a little bit of a difference, a little bit of a difference in analysis from what was said at trial to what was then put forward in the closing? i certainly agree with you. i think the demonstration was not entirely consistent with the evidence, but i think the point was just to use the drama of the dummy and to captivate the jury. i don t think they were paying attention to exactly where the lawyers hands were. i think they were fascinated by the idea they re watching what could have actually happened that evening. and, stacey, do you think go ahead. i was going to say i agree with that. using that kind of aid. certainly jurors lo