there is now a 6 to 3 conservative super majority on the court. give me your view on how dangerous it is that the man with the title of chief justice, chief justice roberts has no control over the court? well, he has some control, but i was struck by the fact that, he tried to strike this middle ground and nobody joined him. he was completely alone. that tells me a little bit of something about the culture of the court, and that they are at ramming speed. look, i understand the anger. i think people ought to be angry if they object to the decision. but i think it is time to also be smart, not go down rabbit holes like backing the court. when i say smart, i think chuck schumer report, pelosi should put legislation on the floor in the next couple of weeks, we can find the right to contraception. since justice thomas said the next things to go might be rethinking the griswold decision.
example, booklets that women are required to be given if they want an abortion are amounted to add false information about abortion like it s tied to breast cancer. it s not, like that it s a dangerous procedure, it s no. it s one of the safest medical procedures, but it s that kind of phony information that permeates the debate. and as an attorney, to stay with you for a second, what would happen, for instance, if you had a complete restriction on contraceptions to say nothing of abortion services, is there any sort of legal redress for women who, for instance, would be denied contraception at their local pharmacy because of religious liberty laws which is another thing that people are worried is coming under a trump administration? well, a couple of things. first of all we do have a fundamental right to use birth control. that s the griswold decision, bedrock constitutional law, but that doesn t mean we have a fundamental right to have our local pharmacy give it to us, and that s
statement. and it s balanced and it s fair. but that hearing was not fair. terry it seems that they have a problem when they are talking or dealing with women s issues having women there. look when president george bush george w. bush signed the partial birth abortion ban in 2003. he was flanked by six men, including then speaker hastert and senator hatch and senator santorum. so it seems like they just have this problem with having women discuss or even be around some very important decision that have to do with women. they denied our witness who was a young female law student. she was there listening to the hearing. they would not allow her on the panel to speak for the young women of america. terry? that s exactly right. and nothing could be in my mind more offensive than a panel of
issues are. this contraceptive thing, my gosh, it s such inexpensive. back in my days they used bare aspirin. this is not just a backer. this is a big money backer. the name is friess of rick santorum talking about back in his days they put bayer aspirin between women s knees. i m sure that you may want to respond in language that s not suitable to the public airways, but can you imagine the arrogance of saying that? even in jest. i tell you, it s insensitive. it s wrong. it shows how they disrespect women. they disrespect our rights. and that their real agenda is to turn us back to 1967 before the griswold decision where the long reach of government goes into the bedroom and denies women the right to contraceptives. this is outrageous. it s wrong. it s against the rights of a
posted strong increases in sales. they are building some of the best products anywhere in the world. the best automobiles in the world. and at the same time increasing market share. by any measure, this has been a great success and we owe president obama for making a very difficult decision, but making the right decision for american workers. jonathan capehart, there s also the attack, as you heard, by willard romney on unions. 16.5% workers in the state of michigan belong to unions. 34% voters say union members are in their household. i mean, is it wise politically? clearly, i don t agree with them in terms of policy, but is it even wise politically to come in with this anti-union i ve stood up and i fought unions before kind of rhetoric if you are trying to appeal to michigan voters? sure, well, remember, he s trying to appeal to republican primary michigan voters.