Aging ping is said to become chinas most powerful ruler since mounted on a communist party. He is up to reelect him for another 5 year term as party leader. She says he doesnt rule out using force to take back time. One added the buddhist legal when youre belinda unbelievable. Stand to the season, gets even better as they beat the rules, the adult book to extend that lead at the top of the league. Ah, ive been for solon welcome. We begin with breaking news from ukraine, where fresh explosions have hit the capital. Keith, president , florida zalinski, says russia, you so cold kamikaze drones to attack, the city keeps mer, says residential buildings have been damaged and he urged people to take shelter. The explosions come one week after moscow launched a large scale air strikes across you, crane. And despite president Vladimir Putin saying he has no plans for further attacks of that kind. Lets cross now to our correspondent, funny for char in cave. Funny several explosions reported ther
not agree which we have all been discussing. to that point, i think the eir is very clear on the significant unavoidable impact that this project would cause. we have to decide whether or not we think that unavoidable impact is mitigated will. many of us do not believe that it is. we believe the document, at least, identifies that the impact is significant and there is an environmentally superior alternatives available to us. that is what i would say on this point. it is not about whether or not the project is great or not great. it is whether or not, for the threshold of what ceqa seems to require, i ve been trying to find out the project description of should actually say. i will said the project objectives in this eir are very similar to project objectives in many other e i ours eirs that we see. we prioritize their objectives in the language, i guess that is how the document is supposed to be written. but we have to exercise discretion in choosing the alternatives w
the project is great or not great. it is whether or not, for the threshold of what ceqa seems to require, i ve been trying to find out the project description of should actually say. i will said the project objectives in this eir are very similar to project objectives in many other e i ours eirs that we see. we prioritize their objectives in the language, i guess that is how the document is supposed to be written. but we have to exercise discretion in choosing the alternatives we might want to pursue. i do not think certifying the eir contradicts that. commissioner miguel: to follow on commissioner borden, this is a situation with whatever has been discussed and evaluated in the eir, in the project comes after that has to fall within that envelope. we do did many projects were the eir envelope in up being a lot bigger than the project eventually is before the commission. i was one of those who voted negative on the motion when it was before us before. i ve actually got th
that is what i would say on this point. it is not about whether or not the project is great or not great. it is whether or not, for the threshold of what ceqa seems to require, i ve been trying to find out the project description of should actually say. i will said the project objectives in this eir are very similar to project objectives in many other e i ours eirs that we see. we prioritize their objectives in the language, i guess that is how the document is supposed to be written. but we have to exercise discretion in choosing the alternatives we might want to pursue. i do not think certifying the eir contradicts that. commissioner miguel: to follow on commissioner borden, this is a situation with whatever has been discussed and evaluated in the eir, in the project comes after that has to fall within that envelope. we do did many projects were the eir envelope in up being a lot bigger than the project eventually is before the commission. i was one of those who voted ne
zoning envelope. the way the planning department asked us to look at these setbacks, i think we have responded positively. next. this is obviously larkin. the building envelope goes across the entire frontage. we have not done not because you re going to maintain the open space between the buildings we are going to maintain the open space between the buildings. the entrance, we have tweaked the entrance since last presentation. it will go through further development. we are adding limestone. next. this is a footprint of the church in the peach color. it is over a footprint of the building. we listen to the concerns of president fong and tried to open up the corner. next. we have pushed the building away from the corner. next. given its more transparency. the sidewalks on both streets are 15 feet from the curb. it is a very large sidewalk. next. looking back towards clay. next. this is the building with the street context from the last hearing and is looking up clay toward