Because i feel like when theres construction people knows about it and they work their way around it for example, on ninth street i go up 7th and people tend to do that but ion a regular basis people are going to avoid the area and with the central subway theres jog going to be a cumulative impact i want to see more discussion at least a response to the written comments and see if it needs to, incorporated into the final eir and again go back to my comments this last preservation i want to see a discussion of the boundary in the eir thats the envelope within which the commission and the department and the Mayors Office can work for negotiating what is in the envelope and if theres options within the air portions of the bridge other options of the ingress and egress that shows up that should be mentioned in the eir so people feel this is not me this is how we get how things work but Community Discussion we get in trouble when people feel like the eir is different than the project when y
Proposed residential easiest are studios and one bedrooms so i dont think i would love this to be part of my written comments when the next final eir hearing it okay i think that there should be clearer aisle of the analysis that supports the Housing Units demanded i tried to find it again, the boundary the eir whats the demand for larger unit sizes and will that be spread it out to the rest of the city and county in the region he want to see that clarified in the Housing Impact analysis not in the eir itself the second thing i wanted to mention was the transit impacts now didnt this is one of those things its an order of operation there was no mention of the fact there was strong discussion about Howard Street and fulsome street being two ways to probably sixth street or so, so this has a huge impact either good or bad on the projects because were not considering the 5 m part of the selma plan that will at least attach on what happens it if that happens theres needs to be i dont know
Necessarily gait the argument could be a reasonable one but once the eir is established nothing can steady or addressed to it but things could be subtracted thats my feeling and thats my general summarization. Commissioner johnson. Thank you very much i would also think supportive of an extension of the Comment Period we had another eir for the defendant project that has been extended so ill be in favor of where the potrero hill eir would have been where the public hearing that was december 1, 67 so anyways thats not a motion or anything but, move on so i want to get to my comments been the eir first, i understand and emphasize and agree with the comments about looking at income level to afford the apartments but i totally am in a place i dont know that has a place in the eir and this needs to be the place to set the precedent especially because we have a development but ill say im not sure based on my reading of the analysis that supports the eir that we everything really is there is