Jewish Ledger
Biden has new tools to fight antisemitism
By Kenneth L. Marcus
(JNS) President-elect Joe Biden has two new tools that can help him in his professed priority to strengthen international ties, support human rights and combat antisemitism. The new tools play well to Biden’s foreign-relations experience and enduring belief in internationalism, which favors intergovernmental alliances, democratic cooperation and a liberal rule-based order.
First, in late December, Congress passed legislation elevating the State Department’s special envoy on antisemitism to ambassadorial status. This should enable the Biden administration to fight antisemitism more effectively on a global scale.
The outgoing special envoy, Elan Carr, did a remarkable job raising public awareness about the world’s oldest hatred. His predecessors in prior administrations–Ira Forman, Hannah Rosenthal and Greg Rickman–were also strong.
Biden has new tools to fight anti-Semitism
Biden has new tools to fight anti-Semitism
Working with allies who have demonstrated their commitment to human-rights values, the president-elect can use the new anti-Semitism ambassador to strengthen American international leadership.
(January 8, 2021 / JNS) President-elect Joe Biden has two new tools that can help him in his professed priority to strengthen international ties, support human rights and combat anti-Semitism. The new tools play well to Biden’s foreign-relations experience and enduring belief in internationalism, which favors intergovernmental alliances, democratic cooperation and a liberal rule-based order.
First, in late December, Congress passed legislation elevating the State Department’s special envoy on anti-Semitism to ambassadorial status. This should enable the Biden administration to fight anti-Semitism more effectively on a global scale.
you had 16, supplied by an individual who was ceo of a company that then came before the court on an appeal from a buy back company for the jury. and the judge was supported by the contributions, declining to recuse himself, and the court entertain the question of whether the do you process clause of the 14th amendment compelled accusal. . . a person with a personal stake in a particular case had a disproportionate influence in placing the judge on the case. the dissenters said there is no standard here. this will cause chaos in the state courts and invite unwarranted refusal actions and should never have been decided this way. the refusal actions will harm and the cure will be worse than the disease. before week think that our predictions will come true, we must remember this could be this term s case of bush vs. gore. justice kennedy could not have been more specific in saying this was particular to the facts here. this was an extreme case. it was a high percentage. it wa