Rosenstein has fwlaring, inexcusable con flicks of interest, that we can no longer ignore. Yesterday, rosenstein had this back and forth with our own Chris Wallace on Fox News Sunday. Take a close look the special council is subject to the rules and regulations, and we dont engage in fishing expeditions. Now that order doesnt detail who may be the subject of the investigation because we dont reveal that publicly. But bob mueller understands and i understand the specific scope of the investigation and so, no, its not a phishing expedition i understand its not a fishing expedition, but you say any matters that arose or may arise directly from the investigation, in the course of his investigation of the issues that he is looking at, if he finds evidence of a crime, can he look at that . Well, chris, if he finds evidence of a crime thats within the scope of what director mueller and i have agreed is the appropriate scope of this investigation, then he can. If its outside that scope, he nee
christopher steel, and used sources tied to the russian government? well, now the evidence is so overwhelming even democrats, even congressman adam shift, mr. i want to be a talk show host guest any time i can, he s now admitting he wants to talk to steele which is even more reason we need special counsel looking into all of these inseses. now it all comes down to this. does rod rosenstein know what s going to happen if mueller s mission creep continues to go unchecked? how does he think voters are going to feel? how many trump supporters will feel robbed of their right and their vote in the free electiontion of the president of the united states? you don t think the country is divided enough now? it will be more divided than ever. half the american people are going to rightly feel cheated. that just can t happen. that is bad for the country. that is bad for the system of justice, and it is bad if we believe in a constitutional republic. here with reaction, fox news anchor attorney gre
about why he rightly believes that rosenstein needs to recuse himself, including this one. rosenstein is likely going to be a witness in this investigation that he caused because he took the lead in writing the letter to president trump on why former f.b.i. director james comby should be fired. by the way, they re looking into that as a possible obstruction. he s a witness. owesenstein is also the guy who appointed robert mueller, and apparently didn t know or didn t care about the fact that the day before naming mueller as special counsel, mueller had an interview with president trump. he wanted to be the f.b.i. director. you can t make this up. now rosenstein has also sat by quietly, turned a blind eye to robert mueller s massive conflicts of interest. like the fact that mueller and james comby are close friends. as colleague, and friend and attorney greg jarrod continues to point out, that relationship could be a violation of two laws
then they came up with a set of talking points. but in the emails released, well, those talking points were redacted. the doj and f.b.i. are not supposed to be political organizations. they are to be non-political. that begs the question, why are the f.b.i., why is the doj coming up with talking points if they re not supposed to be political? if that s not bad enough, tonight we have another stunning piece of information from those doj documents, a daily caller reported earlier today. the the acl j has confirmed that loretta lynch used an email alias as attorney general, going with the name elizabeth carlisle. according to our friend greg jarrod, public officials like loretta lynch, you re not supposed to do that. lynch s attorney defended her use of the fake name to a statement to the daily caller. apparently that kind of conduct is only acceptable in the obama department of justice. doesn t seem to impact rosenstein. now, in addition to finding out that lynch used the email alias,
megyn: fox news alert, the associated press is now leaking new details from a federal grand jury investigation into the finances of former democratic presidential candidate john edwards. the grand jury is looking into whether edwards deliberately broke campaign finance laws in an attempt to cover up his affair and out-of-wed-lock child with reille hunter. hunter was paid to shoot videos by the edwards campaign. the question is whether campaign money was used in fact to keep edwards mistress in hiding, along with the help of his former aid, andrew young. greg jarrod is working the story for us. he will be live soon with that update. plus it is the sort of behavior normally reserved for back rooms at strip clubs, instead some boston lacrosse fans got a bit