is respected and not a supporter of the president. he said basically because of how grave a charge impeachment is, you know, why not give the inquiry more time why not at least try to get the additional evidence that s been withheld. well and professor turly, perfect world, the president is an honest broker and he would not invoked an upcoming election where the clock is running. and would abide by court rulings. he is neither of those. we have overwhelming evidence right now. and it would be nice to have more evidence. but we can t assume the president would follow a supreme court order. he has never said oh if this goes to the courts i ll follow the courts. and most of the matters that professor turly is referring to it s settled precedent in the supreme court. they decided in u.s. v nixon case there are limits to executive privilege. it seems it s a delay tactic by the president. and we have a duty to protect an upcoming election.
respected. yep. and not a supporter of the president. he said basically because of how grave a charge impeachment is, you know, why not give the inquiry more time? why not at least try to get the additional evidence that has been withheld? yeah. well, in professor turley s perfect world, the president is an honest broker and he would not have invoked an upcoming election where the clock is running, and he would abide by court rulings. and he s neither of those. and so, you know, we have overwhelming evidence right now, and yes, of course, it would always be nice to have more evidence. but we can t assume that the president would follow a supreme court order. he s never said, oh, if this goes to the courts, i ll follow what the courts do. and most of these matters that professor turley is referring to, it s settled precedent in the supreme court. they decided in the u.s. v. nixon case that there are limits to executive privilege. it just seems it s a delay tactic by the president,