heard today from director comey, that he answered the questions, that there was really nothing about russia, only the emails and that there was no problem with the fisa or the surveillance warrant process. and it will also allow us to test the statements of republicans that a government lawyer really ran a lot of interference and shut down critical lines of questioning. sean: so much here though. if you look catherine, remember christopher steele in that interrogatory wouldn t stand by his don t dossier. if it was as the nunes and grassly graham memo say, the bulk of information in the fisa applications came from the dossier and its own author doesn t the stand by it one has to question if the email chain exists as john solomon reported that said directly james comey s name was on it, did they verify it? when? what part did they verify? was it wrong? was a fraud committed on the court?
warrant that was july. when you go to the october fisa application, you are right, it was unverified. a footnote that says may be political in nature does not mean it came from the clinton campaign and the dnc. correct. sean: that was withheld. it was known and its would withheld. here is the irony to me. james comey, this is in october. he is arguing that this should go before the fisa. he knows it s going before the fisa court. it s the bulk of information according to the grassly graham memo. ed: yeah. sean: then in january when he goes to see trump at trump tower is he still president-elect before the swearing. in is he telling trump it s unverified and salacious. couple months earlier saying something different. two reports. james comey is telling the president-elect at trump power january 2017 this dossier is unverified. even though if you rewind the tape as you say, back in october 2016, the fisa court judge, it s not made clear that it s unverified.