still very much happening in the united states. reporter: and we talked to a lot of marchers themselves who said that this is a time when they have to change tactics to get their agenda across. going to the states, maybe holding marches like this in all 50 states and doing things at the grass roots level, you know, as kind of, you know, locally as knocking on doors across the country to push their agenda and one lady telling me that her folk russ will be on trying to stop the flow of what she called the the flood of what she called abortion bills coming into the country since roe v. wade was overturned so they are really kind of turning things to a local and very grass roots level at this point. jake? brian todd, thanks. just into cnn, the supreme court marshal is now clarifying that she did in fact talk to the supreme court justices as part of her investigation into the leak of the dobbs draft opinion which ultimately overturned roe v. wade. her investigation could not fig
can hold various campaign candidates accountable. but i think this is a must-watch around the country. i think these are two very different candidates with very different agendas. i think dr. oz has proven if himself to be out of touch for the commonwealth of pennsylvania. fetterman could not be more pennsylvanian through and through. he s got a great agenda. he s relate aring at the relating at the grass roots level, and i think he s got the momentum. make mike the monmouth poll suggests a tight race in pennsylvania. one and only debate. there are concerns about fetter match s health after the stoke he suffered last spring. are expectations too high for dr. oz in the one and only debate? well, i think pennsylvania s going to be an indicator for senate races across the country this fall. and in pennsylvania and in all of the senate races, i think a couple of months ago it leaned democrat, but it ll ultimately be a test if fetterman can get up on that stage and communicate
was counterallegations of domestic violence. you didn t hear talks about speech or public figure standards or provable falsity. you just had all this mud slinging. alex jones took a default judgment on both cases, texas and connecticut, meaning liability was not an issue. we weren t discussing first amendment principles. there wasn t a hard dive on it. so, are those really speech cases? we call them speech cases because we know that s what was claimed. the issue though of why they re going to trial is the more fascinating one. what i m seeing i m grass roots level. this is what i do. yeah. palin was a speech case. right. you were deep dive on actual basic first amendment principles there, motion practice, appeals, reversals. i think and this is just gut feeling, grass roots level, that judges are seeing more and more of what technology is doing in that arena, the privacy, the interrelationship.
we were ready with great candidates, mobilization at the grass-roots level, discipline for the districts we have to win and for money. we are outraising the republicans. we don t need endless. we will have enough. one of the issues that s going to be at stake on this election is democracy and the end of the january 6th investigation, if the republicans take over the house. it dies with the end of this congress. all their evidence gathered. you stood up to donald trump throughout your tenure, ripping his state of the union speech and standing up and walking out of the cabinet meeting with the leadership. you put him on notice. now we have seen you said on day of the riot, you said if he led the rioters and came up to the hill, you would have punched him
nonprofit institutions, needed to start being better represented in the legal academy and start raising a new generation of law students that were trained to think in ways that were found in business interests, and in forms of the federalist society, they found an elite sort of petry dish that would train the next generation of law clerks and then judges to think and fashion these theories that dahlia in the previous segment was telling you, not based on the constitution, and not based on fab rated out of whole cloth bationed on outcome-based reasoning and they paired that with a political strategy, that forged a union with the evangelical movement in this country, weaponized the roe issue, the roe issue is not something right after 1973 was immediately something that the republicans seized on, it was something that about a decade later they realized had some political opportunity that they could mobilize for those at a grass roots level, and also gun voters and animating the second