president has always been calling for? i think that would be wise to because alternative doesn t play out well for them. the president will declare a national emergency. he s framed the issue correctly as one of national security and humanitarian crisis on the border. and if democrats want to tie up some executive action in the courts, then, there can be no comprehensive immigration reform as long as the wall is in resolve, and without that the dreamers are high and dry and they re statistic in limbo that s a constituency that is very important to the democrats and structural pressure will be on them not on the republicans to resolve it. so if it ends up going that way i would check to make the proposal to trump to break the long jam. they won t be happy if it is tied up with the court. david do you think that chuck and nancy can support building some type of barrier? you threw a graphic up that shows that a majority of the american people don t support building a wall they do
where people were leaning that didn t like both clinton and trump. and he won those voters 2-1. well, i wanted to put this graphic up. these are people who don t like either political party right now. in september, the split between, who did they want to be in control of congress among people who were negative on both parties was advantage democrats, but narrowly, 33/38. look at this number here in october. among those that are negative on both, it is suddenly an open break here towards the democrats. 59/17. that s what we saw with donald trump, peggy, it was narrow in september. october came and the ones that were negative on both broke heavily towards donald trump. what does that tell you? and now it s breaking heavily towards the democrats in general, towards that kind of thing. i don t know, exactly, what it means. my sense in this campaign, in a way to bop off something you said, katy, is that there are a lot of different local issues coming up that have something to
chemical weapons again. we support our diplomats who are working to set the conditions for the united nations backed geneva process to succeed, and we look forward to working with the united nations envoy to syria, stephan de mistera in an effort to maintain transparency. mckenzie will provide a detailed overview of the actual operations. general mckenzie? i m going to just talk about the military details of the strikes that we executed last night. could i get the first graphic up, please? as you ve heard from the president of the united states and directly in this room from secretary mattis and dunn ford, the united states, the united kingdom and france, three of the five perminent members of the u.n. security council conducted a coordinated strike in response to the syrian use of chemical weapons. this combined military strike was directed against three
working to set the conditions for the united nation s backed geneva process to succeed and we look forward to working with united nations envoy to syria, in an effort to maintain transparency, mckenzie will provide a detailed overview of the actual operations. thanks. ladies and gentlemen, good morning. i m going to spend the next couple minutes talking of the military details and the strikes last night. could i get the first graphic up, please. as you heard from the president of united states and directly from this room, secretary mattis and dunford. they conducted a proportional, precision, coordinated strike in response to the syrian regime s use of chemical weapons. this combined strike was directed against three distinct chemical weapons targets. i m going to show them to you in
i think it s 36 or 37 39. i mean, that s to me where the story is. jack, let me ask you something. so he won by 20 points and then tonight, you know, i guess, well, almost two years later you can say. not quite. a year and a half later. he possibly, the republican candidate possibly loses? that doesn t scare you? no, it does scare me. there s no question that our party s going to have to do what conor lamb does is sometimes triangulate between where the white house is and their own provincial politics. you have to do that. democrats and republicans do that in their own party all the time, where they have to triangulate and they have to get on the ground and they have to knock on every single door but they also while you re answering this i want to put this graphic up, jack, and i m going to let you finish here. this is a graphic from the new york times. the blue arrows show where voters trended from republican to democrat since 2016.