have a problem with funding this organization? you know, i think the congressional investigation along with the various date investigations, those were a factor in the decision. but make no mistake about it, it was a bigger picture than that. there is a granting criteria. i m not going to get into too much on the internal aspects of things, but, you know, this organization had a right to make what it felt was the best decision for the mission, for the mission. and i think everyone can agree that if you have a grantee where there s this type of controversy surrounding it, komen was doing its level best to move to neutral ground. and i will say, i was asked to look at options for doing that, some alternatives to do that. i was asked to do that. i looked at it and i did. it wasn t your idea, however, you re saying? i m saying that this was long an issue for komen, dealing with the controversies of planned parenthood. before you got there. notice that karen handel, in
foundation has just resigned. karen then ran to what she surely thought would be the safety of fox news to tell her story, but even fox news had trouble accepting her spin. it didn t smell right. it didn t pass the smell test. it seemed like planned parenthood was indeed the targeted organization and why not say we have a problem with funding this organization? you know, i think the congressional investigation along with the various state investigations, those were a factor in the decision, but make no mistake about it. it was a bigger picture than that. there is a granting criteria, and you know, i m not going to get into too much on the internal aspects of things. this organization had a right to make what it felt was the best decision for the mission, for the mission. i think everyone can agree that if you have a grantee where there s this type of controversy surrounding it, komen was doing its level-best to move to neutral ground, and i will say i
companies when we call a pharmaceutical company to the house floor or to a committee hearing to talk about tainted medicine? so there s nowhere for them to go here. planned parenthood is audited like no other federal grantee in the entire country. they are let me ask you this, congresswoman, and we invited komen to come on tonight, a representative, and they declined. there s been this real war on women by the right wing. is this but another example and another casualty of this war on women and war on women s right to choose and to decide what to do with their lives and their bodies. i hate using the term war on women because, you know, women are strong. we re capable. we re able to take care of ourselves. but we re not going to allow for the diminution of rights and benefits to women and poor women and young women and women
okay, getting off the phone when your daddy calls. i hate getting off the phone with him. do he call you a lot? he calls me at least three times a month. he don t call us though. he call granny s house. he calls grantee s house. i think we should write a letter to the prison and tell them we want more time. they say, we can t give him too much. we can t give him any more time on the telephone, here, y all just take him. wouldn t that be nice? that would be nice. he only got 30 years left. maybe so.
experiment. that interview later in the hour. but first, we start with this question, the lab theory is indeed true as the show has been saying come out what role did our own medical bureaucracy play in the fiasco? we know that nih funnel taxpayer dollars to the wuhan it s your virology for the coronavirus research. which doctors even dr. fauci admits but he denies finding gain of function experiments. you gave them money and you said don t do gain a function research. correct. it s because they said we won t. correct. you have no way of knowing except you trust him, is that right? we generally always trust the grantee to do what they say. how did you know they didn t do the research and not put it on the website? there is no way of guaranteeing that.