i figure there must be food safety standards. greg: that wasn t a food cart you brought it from. a man holding juan: he was selling fruit shakes? greg: you have kids who are republicans. right? did i just out them? juan: well, that s true. greg: it s an oddity. liberal parent and conservative kids. juan: i don t know how liberal. yeah, i mean, in fact, my youngest who is working to get one of your republican pals re-elected when he went to the college i went to, he actually quit some classes because he said he is just sick of the professors who would not treat conservative arguments honestly. i understand that. i don t like the idea you would back off, because i think you engage the argument, force the conversation. but in this study what it said was that people who were doing the hiring who were looking at grant proposals literally would exercise bias against conservatives. what does it mean to me? it means that the quality of their work is less if you talk
it six months ago? if you went near the story fact-checkers from an army of ballots descended upon you and you were basically called a pandemic birther in order to scare the be out of anybody who follow down that path. but the cover-up started to crack. conservatives online following the money and where the grants went, even found the language in the grant proposals talking about the gain of function research. and scientists speak up, even the security council said we are not really buying what china is selling, and the w.h.o. delegation was a complete disaster. they go over there, and they did not present a shred of evidence for the natural theory. and not a shred of evidence why there is a mountain of evidence on the other side saying that it came from the lab. i m not going to bore you with that. i bore the audience on my