personal involvement and that s obstruction, and to bring it to the forefront. so, understanding sort of the role of one committee place against doj, how far could it be to secure convictions on the charges that they are looking at? that is a question that only the justice department knows at this point, for a couple of reasons: doj is in the middle of a granfd jury process, that means that they are talking with witnesses. and it is one thing to be an armchair prosecutor and to see only the strength and the evidence, and to see how obvious it is that the former president engaged in gross misconduct. the prosecutors and doj are staring into the eyes of these witnesses to determine whether they are credible, determining whether there s any problems are gaps in the evidence, and making sure that they can prove beyond reasonable doubt every element of the criminal case. so their job isn t just to look at the strength of the case,