grande mal version of that relationship. ibturn pecker gave him coverage. that s the quid pro quos. if the national inquirer had this story and there was a discussion potentially about paying and then there was no payment, why wouldn t there be? if you re running for president, you re worried about it and this is what it s going to take to get it buried, why wouldn t the payment then happen? i can t speak to why the president didn t pay or there was no agreement reached for the payment, but i do think one of the most interesting aspects of what happened today is the fact that michael cohen taping his client, which formal federal prosecutors i spoke to today is totally unethical and almost completely unheard of. really undermines this narrative we ve been talking about for months is cohen s loyalty to their client. someone who tapes their client and potentially exposes them to this, do they really have that