in less than 12 hours the district attorney fani willis will begin presenting her election interference case to a granary in georgia. indictments for donald trump and his allies could come down as soon as tuesday evening. breaking tonight, we are learning about one possible focus of witnesses presentation. a voting system breach in coffee county. that is a rural heavily republican area of the state. now, text messages and emails reference in public court documents show that lawyers working for trump, coordinated a visit to coffee county s election office along with data specialists hired by ex trump lawyer and conspiracy theorist sydney powell. the big breaking siren tonight, cnn is now reporting that those text messages are indeed part of fani willis s investigations and to understand the importance of this revelation i want to give you a little bit more context about it let s go back in time for a moment here.
is using damning communications from trump s legal team to build a possible racketeering case and we will get into that. alarming threats as ex president ace is more legal challenges. his supporters are sending dangerous messages to the nation s most powerful officials then fighting back arizona secretary of state adrienne fontes joins us to discuss a new wave of election denialism a dangerous one. how he is working to protect the 2024 race. i m ayman mohyeldin, let s get started. in less than 12 hours the district attorney fani willis will begin presenting her election interference case to a granary in georgia. indictments for donald trump and his allies could come down as soon as tuesday evening. breaking tonight, we are learning about one possible focus of witnesses presentation. a voting system breach in coffee, county. that is a rural heavily republican area of the state. now, text messages and emails
must be to the client not to the payer. so the lawyers representing walt nauta, even though they re being paid by the state of america back, they are duty bound to do what is within walt nauta s best interest. there s extra pressure on them judging by who they re who s paying them, to be clear, they would have to advise nauta as to what is in his best interests regardless of who is paying their fee. but it s another pressure on nauta, to be concerned about that he is beholden even more to donald trump because of the payment of legal fees. andrew weissmann and timothy heaphy, thank you very much for starting our conversation. please stay with us, because we have much more to get to. when we come back, donald trump s lawyers met in washington today in anticipation and on trump being indicted by jack smith s watching to granary. investigating events leading up to and on january six. that s next. y six. that s next.
-controlled leave leadership pack was pain. the rules do not preclude that. the rules allow third parties to pay for legal representation. but the lawyers duty of loyalty must be to the client not to the payer. so the lawyers representing walt nauta, even though they re being paid by the state of america back, they are duty bound to do what is within walt nauta s best interest. there s extra pressure on them judging by who they re who s paying them, to be clear, they would have to advise nauta as to what is in his best interests regardless of who is paying their fee. but it s another pressure on nauta, to be concerned about that he is beholden even more to donald trump because of the payment of legal fees. andrew weissmann and timothy heaphy, thank you very much for starting our conversation. please stay with us, because we have much more to get to. when we come back, donald trump s lawyers met in washington today in anticipation and on trump being indicted by jack smith s watching
weeks before doing something. so, i do think it s imminent, but i can t tell you what they. we are all waiting. we wish you could, mary. so, tim, i mean, you are there, of course, we all watch very closely when richard donoghue testified before the grand january six committee. it was so powerful. reporting suggests his whole jack smith s team the same thing, that he told the committee publicly. what do you make of the reporting that he s not yet been asked to testify in front of the granary? yeah, it makes no difference whether he s been before the grand jury or not because he s been so consistent. he testified even before the select committee got his testimony, before the senate judiciary committee told them the very same thing that he told us in an eight hour transcribed interview, that he s now indicated the same thing he told the special counsel. whether that is before the grand jury or not is of no because he is on record as having been one of those handful of people, jen, t