enforcement, even this committee telling us six to eight weeks, ten weeks. ludicrous. we have all the footage, gps data, we know which law enforcements officers were aware and at what time. the public and the people of the state of texas deserve to know what went wrong and we deserve to know it now. the statesman says that documents they reviewed, quote, some officers at the scene, one officer says that if there is a kid in there, we need to go in there. and then another responds, whoever is in charge will determine that. now, senator, we still don t know who was in charge, right? i mean, how big of a problem is that? yeah. as i talked to different law enforcement in the region, as i m doing my own investigation here, don, i keep getting the same narrative, that they were reading off of each other and they were just frozen in time,
as tom said, transparency is critical here from the local police officials here. here is my assessment. the final after action report, there will be one, will take weeks if not months. why does it take so long. forensic evidence, gps data, body camera, cell phone video, live streaming, the information from the killer himself, all of it has to be put together, not mind by minute. it has to be second by second. critical is the time in the school. the killer went to the school to when the shooting stopped and part of that assessment will be and must be, it has to be transparent. what was the role of local law enforcement, and what was done well, not done well, and being open and honest about that. the piece that is frequently said here is interviews of
this man had 52 violations, in prison? yes. and yet, he still walks out? still, walks out. there s no punishment. 52 infractions and no consequences. golsby, a registered-sex offender, was assigned a parole officer. and what the tokes family learned next made them sick to their core. at the time of reagan s murder, golsby was wearing an ankle monitor. when i hear someone has an ankle monitor, i always thought it meant, like, if they went outside of their zone. or past their curfew, that an alarm would go off somewhere. and the police would show up, immediately. right. and arrest them. and most people do. and that is what s even more disturbing about it is most people think that. was anyone watching him? no. the tokes family was surprised to learn that police don t have direct access to the gps data from ankle monitors. it s usually collected by private companies that make and sell the devices and then share the data with parole officers. the information, general
using gps data from a phone. next, let s hear from the former assistant us attorney for the eastern district of new york. whereas she had enormous power, she had enormous resources, what we are going to see is that, in contrast, the other victims did not have that, and so she is really a difficult person to engender sympathy for her and i think that is going to be a real challenge for the defence in this case. ghislaine maxwell denies the allegations. her lawyers are expected to argue she s being made a scapegoat for epstein s crimes. we re also expecting them to say that her accusers have false memories. we know that because of this letter shared by her lawyer before the trial. in it, they say psychiatry and memory experts will testify in her defence. one of them is expected to tell the court that epstein, like many people who achieve great power and wealth , created and exploited a halo effect to surround himself with people who would serve his needs .