will do it. but i am interested to see. dana: i want you to listen about these claims what murdaugh said was happening at the kennels and what his brother said yesterday. call for number two. your friends and family heard for the first time your story about the kennels yesterday. yes, i agree with that. when did you first learn your brother was down at the kennels just before the murders, two days ago with the rest of us? no. to hear that audio and i saw the kennel and at that point i heard his voice and i knew it was him. dana: what does that mean for the prosecution? in my opinion the prosecution s best evidence in this case and as we ve heard most of it is circumstantial but the fact he is at the crime scene at the time or right around the time of these murders is critical. that s the best thing they have got. they have cell phone data, gps data. he is at the scene and frankly
he told him first he d checked his wife maggie and then paul, and another time he told him he checked paul and then maggie and also said he called 911 first, but we know from gps data, wolf, he arrived at that house according to gps data just 20 seconds before he made that 911 call, so did he have time to check his wife and son before calling 911 in just 20 seconds. tomorrow, wolf, now that both sides have fully rested the jury in the morning is going to go to the crime scene, the hunting property where the murders took place, take a look at the dog kennels and see where the murders happened, see if food room were paul murdaugh was killed asked have closing arguments and then they ll start to deliberate. we ll see what happens. randy kaye, thank you very much for all your excellent reporting over these many weeks. let s get reaction from cnn legal analyst joey jackson. joey, this jury is hearing
harvey morrow was about to stand trial for murder. prosecutors believed the motive war murder, that morrow shot the former raid crow star after steven confronted him about his missing fortune. armed with crucial gps data, they felt ready to prove their case. but the defense had a stunning surprise in store. new evidence that threatened to shatter the very foundation of the prosecution s argument. could harvey morrow walk away a free man? here s keith morrison with the conclusion of who killed the radio star? it had taken five long years to get to this point, but harvey morrow was finally being tried for the murder of steven b. police and prosecutors felt confident. that is, until the defense gave its opening statement and things took an unexpected turn. during the opening statement,
his son paul took moments before the murder. and he testified his distrust of law enforcement and paranoia due to opioid use led him to try for nearly two years. i would get paranoid thinking, and it could be anything, that triggered it. it might be a policeman following me in a car. that night, june 7th, after finding mags and paul, don t talk to anybody without with you. my partners were repeatedly telling me that. and on friday, the prosecutor waters hammered away at his location at crucial points, video, gps data, texts calls and a step count on his phone to account for his
reporter: yeah. on friday the prosecutor hammered away at alex s location at crucial points during and after the murders. the prosecutor used video, gps data, texts, calls and a step count recorded on alex s phone to challenge his movements to which he couldn t specifically account for particularly when prosecutors asked alex what he was doing when he returned to his home and retrieved his phone in the minutes after prosecutors say his son and his wife were killed with a shotgun and assault-style rifle. you remember so much detail about everything else, but you don t remember what you were specifically doing to generate 283 steps while you re making all these phone calls in the same 4-minute period. i never manufactured anial any alibi in any way, shape or form because i did not and would not hurt my wife and my child. reporter: yeah. and, jon, so the defense has