we don t need to. let s pass these laws, and that s my good frustration. a sitting here, knowing, maybe not the next shooter, the shooter after that, we are forced to cover. like the rest of the american media. unlike any other industrialized country that has as many problems, but not as many guns. they don t cover the stuff, chris. the problem is, we have more guns sold without the appropriate infrastructure, and we know the answers. so let s fix it. and chris murphy have said to you, tonight, he wants to. the democrats have the apparatus to change it. and you know what, if we can t get expanded brady laws through the senate, then maybe route to fix the filibuster, because of stopping a lot of other things. i think from me, as a mom, it s very hard. because there are people sitting here in our country tonight who did drop off their kids in the state of texas. and they will never see them again. that is something that never ever ends. and for me, it really star democracy in o
culture that gives us gun violence. there is one party, as the congresswoman alluded to, that is saying enough funds enough, let s at least try to do something. so of gun violence prevention, as we are today the democratic party is a national political party in what you find a home. mark, you have government shootings. and i learned a lot from your reporting on this. particularly about how we cover them, and i think actually in the decade have been doing this as changed, and formed by some of the research, we to spent, cover to suspend a lot of time on the shooters, and what they, the and i think that we learned it s actually dangerous. there s a copycat effect. i do worry, again, this is, news we re gonna cover, corresponding time on the shooter. we ve changed the way recovered it. but, i just can t just set of the people.