written about extensively. and any clinton watcher has written about extensively about how she has been managed so long and in campaign structures so long and if she can only be herself it would be better for her. and i think that s what you re seeing here. she was terrific in this interview. i did ask tough questions. i went right at the server. here is that exchange with the secretary. for me, it was never the e-mails. it was the server. and you obviously admire mike more rell as much as i do. you quote him. i always thought your server was compromised, madam secretary. that s what bothered me about it. as you read my comment, he talked about government servers. there is no doubt that our government servers at the time i was serving as secretary of state were compromised. and there is at least in so far as we know no evidence that my private server was. and i think that the russians, encouraged by then-candidate
democrat labeled a substantial security threat. investigators saying that imran awan transferred massive amounts of data on government servers while on the payroll of several house democrats including debbie wasserman schultz. scott perry of pennsylvania, who sits on the cybersecurity panel of the homeland security committee aired these concerns about imran awan at an informal hearing attended only by fellow gop lawmakers yesterday afternoon. the storage and flow of data arranged by awan posed a substantial security threat to the united states. he was arrested in august and charged with bank fraud and other financial crimes unrelated to his i.t. work for house democrats. he has pleaded not guilty. his wife, who worked with him and also charged, agreed this summer to return to the u.s. from pakistan. perry detailed how a bag marked
rachel. there is political context here, which we shouldn t ignore, which is that the republican congress and the trump campaign made a huge stink last year during the presidential campaign about hillary clinton as secretary of state having used a private e-mail server and that context resonates in terms of the hypocrisy of double standard. with that no doubt about it. no doubt about it. with that understanding, what do you think is the appropriate level of concern to have about them using a private e-mail server in the context? we have a situation where, rach rachel, first of all, it s against the law it s not against the law to use the private server but they have to transfer information within 20 days, government information and official information to government servers. obviously, they did not do that. what we re most concerned about is what you said in the beginning of this segment. we re concerned, rachel, about national security.
against the law it s not against the law to use the private server but they have to transfer information within 20 days, government information and official information to government servers. obviously, they did not do that. what we re most concerned about is what you said in the beginning of this segment. we re concerned, rachel, about national security. we don t know what is in these documents, but the thing that really concerns us is that, you know, within 24 to 48 hours after mr. gouty, the chairman and i sent a preservation letters, which means don t destroy any documents, do not relocate them because they may very well be a part of an investigation and we may need these documents. they then suddenly, that is, ms. trump and her husband, mr. kushner transferred them to the trump organization and so we
servers and cross-referenced across federal data bases to weed out fraud. do you have faith in the security of federal data bases to have, if not in your state, all that private data of americans? there s no reason to provide this data. again, we don t know why they want this. there s information that s publicly available. we operate excellent election system here in rhode island. it s fair, efficient and accurate, and there s no evidence of widespread fraud. so we are not going to comply with this. as i say, i m alarmed they are even asking for it. governor raimondo, good to see you. we wish you a very happy fourth of july weekend. thank you. you, too. thank you very much. more ahead.