800-page document, get to the printers and back, there s a government process for that. i checked in with the printer today and that s what they continue to say. that s what they said in public. as for what is going on behind the scenes we don t have a lot of reporting on that. we know this has compromises. we know they were saying they weren t going to do criminal referrals, i remember when the majority of the members were talking that down, in the end they did that. luke, you re a man who s broke a lot of news on the 1/6 committee, its processes and finding. if there s anybody, one thing i m eager to know, what is going on with the report? in my years of reporting one thing that washington has never been ill equipped to do is produce large quantities of paper, in this case they seem to be having a problem. what s happening? my understanding they re
and i think sometimes we look at this too narrow, caught up in the personality of donald trump, the broader question is, how do we tolerate this kind of reckless disregard for government process and procedure? that alone should make him have to pay a price to restore the dignity of the government and establish the people that these things are supposed to work based on rules and based on what has been set forward. he s just thrown all that to the wind. i think that s dangerous. so coming up on morning joe, a broadway show that is was destined to be a broadway hit. instead, closes, begging the question what happened? the show s star, who happens to be the youngest black american playwright in broadway history, will join us to explain. and up next, new polling shows republican voters are fed up with donald trump. they are done. but is trump s fever on america
for considered just conspiracy lori conspiracy to interfere with government process. and doj will take that obligation very seriously no matter whether they, where they end up landing on that. i don t think the two cases are mutually exclusive. i hate saying it is unprecedented, but it truly is. we have never had a president to gauged in so much criminality on so many different fronts. and so doj will have to face a decision based on the evidence in the law here. to a scab, think. you nicholas wu, thank you as well. after the break everybody. does the insurrectional boil down to the former presidents desperation to not lose election and avoid the embarrassment that would follow? the evidence certainly makes it seem that way. what are we going to do here, folks? i only need 11,000 votes. fellas, i 11th of votes. give me a break. give me a break. give me a break.
investigators were looking to get it back? so, john kelly, it s a great piece in the washington post put out earlier today, said it is arrogance. that trump was dismissive of intelligence officials. he thought their presentations were sort of unimpressive. he would routinely take classified documents during the briefings and keep him for himself. and he just felt that these documents belong to him. that they were part of his presidency and he should be able to keep them. john bolton, another former aide, a former national security adviser, said the same thing. that trump s and i m just quoting now. but it fits a pattern here of basically, trump s arrogance. and a dismissal of government process, and a real suspicion of career public officials, in government. paul, let s go back to garland. before the warrant was released, you wrote a piece in the
documents belonged to him. that they were part of his presidency and he should be able to keep them. john bolton, another former aide, a former national security adviser, said the same thing. that trump s and i m just quoting now. but it fits a pattern here of basically, trump s arrogance. and a real dismissal of government process, and a real suspicion of career public officials, in government. paul, let s go back to garland. before the warrant was released, you wrote a piece in the washington post, where you question the doj s choice to go after trump on this issue. you wrote, quote, the first prosecution of a former u.s. president needs to be worthy of the historic weight. after seeing what the warrant says, do you still believe what he wrote then? i sure do, charles. with trump now, it s kind of like federal and state prosecutors. take a number, wait your turn.