conspiring to put forth big electors and what the object of that is to abstract a government proceeding or government function that would make it another. each one of these offenses were five-year counts and i don t think trump would prosecute or would be able to do 5 minutes, forget about five years. why do you say that, what would be difficult about that? jail and stuff i don t know if that is something he could get used to. i think the biggest question here is not do you have the facts that are going to support this and the tougher part of this is prosecutorial obstruction and a good prosecutor can find the facts
testimony all of the events. but the issue you zero in on so wisely, nicole, is crime. this committee is not fooling around with on the edges, side characters, possible problems. it s dereliction of duty. possible evidence of obstruction of a government proceeding, congressional proceeding. all of them covered by 18 usc, right? all of them under the federal criminal code. so, i don t think they re going to divert from their pattern, their missile pattern tomorrow. that s the most speculative i can be. so, the tim, to talk about this committee s aggressive targeting of the head of the fish is very consistent with all the analysis of liz cheney, and she doesn t believe that simply prosecuting insurrectionists deals with the cancer that is trumpism. this rejection of facts and
and i think the committee rightfully says, you know what s free and equal time is? it s sitting in a witness chair, and giving testimony under oath. and he has so far not provided that. i want to add one thing to let my great friend and prosecutor, who i covered often, glenn kirschner mentioned, which is about the trial in the evidence. one thing that bodes well for prosecution i m not a person who pushes one thing or another, but one thing that bodes well in my mind for prosecution is that the charges of sedition that have already been brought against the proud boys and the oath keepers center on one anchor of the law, and that is trying to violently obstruct a proceeding, a government proceeding, essentially, a congressional one. to try to interrupt january 6th. well, we have all the evidence in front of us of how donald
trump, and team trump, and i make that a broader group, engaged in it conspiracy, again, we have the evidence, not the proof, but the evidence suggesting the teen gauged in a conspiracy multiple people, to block a government proceeding. and while he may not have used a gun to do that, he used a lot of lies. lies he knew where lies. lies he told over and over again, by his attorney general, his daughter, his chief of staff, his white house counsel. you have to be willfully blind not to know that you are pushing a lie, and you are using it to obstruct a government proceeding. the doj has already put down the ship, this is the other chip. clint, this is what you study. extremism and extreme groups. what would it take to connect, or have they connected the former president to the proud boys? i think those are some of
oath. and he has so far not provided that. i want to add one thing to let my great friend and prosecutor, who i covered often, glenn kirschner mentioned, which is about the trial in the evidence. one thing that bodes well for prosecution i m not a person who pushes one thing or another, but one thing that bodes well in my mind for prosecution is that the charges of sedition that have already been brought against the proud boys and the oath keepers center on one anchor of the law, and that is trying to violently obstruct a proceeding, a government proceeding, essentially, a congressional one. to try to interrupt january 6th. well, we have all the evidence in front of us of how donald trump, and team trump, and i make that a broader group, engaged in a conspiracy, again,