at hillary clinton who now supports no-fly zone. the president opposes a no-fly zone for now. a statement directed to presidential candidates because as they are asked questions and are taking positions on them, i think it s important for the american people to understand exactly what those positions mean. people are calling them different thing, no-fly zone or safe zone, but for those pushing for this, they ve got to be held accountable for the decision they re making that this will require u.s. air assets to enforce it, it will require u.s. air assets to take out anti-aircraft missile defense systems, for example, that the syrian government has and, again that puts us in a direct head-to-head conflict with sovereign government, government of syria, russia, and their allies, and will also require a very large amount of ground troops on the ground to enforce this. there are a slew of other issues with this and why i think no-fly zone would be a terrible mistake. i know you re conce
hack into private e-mail account of the cia director, john brennan. this guy says it was a one, obviously pretty easy. here s the question, should top u.s. officials have private e-mail accounts? well they shouldn t be using them for anything related to classified information or government information, information related to their work. people have personal lives and i get that, but the important thing here is that, in if you are a position you should not be sending classified information, not sending information related to your work and your job on your personal e-mail account. we re seeing here now, yet, another reason why this is critical and so important. yeah. because everybody was a top official seems to have g-mail or aol or some other personal account. i assume you have one as well. i do. i ve got a personal account and a work account and i do my work, business on work e-mail account like so many other people do, both those who work in government and those who work in the
us 0en 9/11 and trying to defee at the same time supporting them with arms to overthrow the syrian government. you don t want the u.s. government to provide arms to the rebels. i don t want the u.s. government to provide weapons to al qaeda, to islamic extremists, our enemy. it s a simple concept in my mind you can t defeat your enemy if you re arming them and helping them at the same time. makes so neense. have you told this to officials. it s important for the american people to stand up and say, look, we don t want to go and do what happened in iraq with saddam hussein. do what happened in libya with gadhafi. these are countries that have fallen into chaos and taken over because of actions the united states and others took. any candidate who supports safe no-fly zone in syria must admit u.s. coalition ground air troops are needed to enforce. yes. that s a statement directed
sensitive and classified information on a daily basis, this is why it s so important, because there are so many vulnerabilities in the private e-mail servers, and unfortunately there are vulner ables in the government servers that need fixed the personal account has been shut down. and i suspect a lot of other senior officials are taking a closer look at personal e-mail accounts now as well. let s talk about this deal, this agreement that was worked out between the united states and russia to avoid accidental head-on collision between fighter jets over syria. the secrecy of the deal, not making it public, does that concern you? it doesn t. the pentagon knows and understands how important it is to make sure our troops are not put into harm s way and we re not put into a situationer you have accidental military conflict with russia in the air. making this deal with russia to deconflict that is an important thing. there s a bigger issue here, that i m concerned with the fact that the u.
who say they re behind it and now threatening to release more sensitive information including the social security number of the cia director, john brennan. our justice reporter, evan perez, working the story for us. hackers are communicating. today released new, sensitive information from top u.s. government officials? well, wolf they keep making that threat but have not yet released any of that information that they say they have. really, they re playing catch me if you can with the fbi, secret service. i m told investigators have some ideas of where these people are and who they might be, but they re not ready yet to make these arrests. we hope to see maybe some action on that in the next couple of days, wolf. laurie segall, cnn reporter, she spoke to this alleged hacker, recording the conversation. let me play a little clip. listen to this. we have most of his personal information, like his name, address, phone number, social security number, and other