was the u.s. government reportedly reading their emails. we ll ask two targets of the covert nsa surveillance program next. there were two significant earthquakes in the state, where are sez are residents there suddenly buying earthquake insurance like it s going out of style? let s show em what it means to be built ford tough. ready to save the world? i ll drive. the ford summer spectacular sales event. now playing at ford dealers everywhere.
spying and question on these individuals who are in front of you and also the three that we named took place if 2006, 2007, and 2008. in the case of faisal, it was many years after he was at that council. it was during the time he was the republican nominee for the house of delegate seat in virginia. and so, the question that you asked him what about these clients that you represented, there are all sorts of people who represent highly questionable foreign governments and bob livingston represented moammar gadhafi and joe trippy represents the government of bahrain, lanny davis represents every tyrant on the planet and none of those people who are similarly situated and who have greater contacts and are aren t muslim seem to be on this list and that s the reason why it raises the suspicion along with documents like the one we published like the fbi on the fisa form for a sample is writing things like mohammed raghead and usingeth lick slurs against arabs and muslims and do
stories published by other media outlets about america sa, using nsa documents that didn t indicate that edward snowden was their source for the documents leading, i think, to the reasonable suspicion that there is another source or sources providing documents to media outlets. all right. back to your story. the government says that they don t spy without reason. you haven t actually seen the fisa documents or other legal documents justifying the surveillance, right? so we don t know what the justification was. right. when i ve seen is all the evidence about how these american citizens have lived their lives and the fact that they ve never been shcharged wi a crime let alone convicted of a crime and they re all public figures that have led exam lary lives and cannot remotely be said acting as an agent of a foreign power. that leads to the question why were they targeted. let s get to you.
should we expect israeli ground troops in gaza and more largely, is there even a military solution to this problem? you should expect israel s government to do what any government would do. we have 6 million israelis over the last two days that have had to run into bomb shelters in israel. we ve had air sirens go off in tel aviv which is our new york, in jerusalem which is our washington and you can imagine what the american people would demand their government to do if two-thirs to three-quarters of the population of the country had to run into bomb shelters. the prime minister of israel will do what he has to do to end the rocket attacks. we don t have a five-point cease-fire. stop rocket attacks against israel. it s very simple. you say you and your governments say you re targeting hamas, but you ve heard children have been killed. innocent people have been killed, children by definition. that s right. they re not targeted and it makes a big moral difference
you both have had associations in the past that were written about in glen s story that people might wonder about. you have done legal representations for groups that have been charged by the u.s. government of being associated with terrorism and you worked briefly for the american muslim council and the leader of the group was later sentenced to jail for the libyan plot for the crown prince of saudi arabia. is it not possible that those were the reasons why there was surveillance? i ll start with you. i m a civil rights lawyer. i had a lot of clients, if it s my clients that s calling it, that s a reason for pause to find out what benefit does the government have listening in on the lawyer s communications in my case his client, what information can they use in court. in these cases i was against the government and i was winning against the government.