investigated. criminal referrals likely to come out of that type of investigation would be for false statements or other violations in respect to the inspector general office. those could be serious obviously. what has long disturbed many of susthat the clinton email investigation was anything but regular. i mean, it was the level of deverance given to the clinton staff was remarkable. they had potion of government material, yet they had conditions on which they would allow that material to be reviewed. martha: you think about the level of immunity given to high
what is so wrong with that? laura: it doesn t matter. you cannot send government material to a third party under fbi regulations. it was not government material. laura: wait a second, scott. he s creating a memo to the fbi file on his meeting not later, he went into the sedan, he said at one point, 5 minutes, it was 5 minutes, on the government commuter. i will argue that case against you in court every day. it was done in response to bad conduct of donald trump. laura: it was done on government time. government time on government property. saul? saul? saul? yeah? laura: what is your response? if you are in the independent counsel s office, deputy independent counsel, you re writing a file on a government
and others. laura: it doesn t matter if it is classified or not, you cannot send government material to a third party under that s the key. it doesn t matter. laura: wait a second. he is creating a memo to the fbi file. on his on his meeting not later. he went into the sedan after going into the white house. it was five minutes on a government computer. i will argue that case in court against you every day of the week. was it on perfumed stationary? it was done in the response to the bad conduct of president trump. laura: it was done on government time and government property. that s not the standard. laura: saul, what s your response to that? if you are in the independent counsel s office and you are writing a memo to the file on a
he has created coverage for himself at the hillary clinton case. jason: his argument was that she did not have the cognitive ability to figure out what was classified and not classified. the director of the fbi is not going to be able to claim that he does not know that. kennedy: he said, she did not intend to do any harm to the country. jason: but he did intend. kennedy: i agree with you, he was not jotting down some haiku s about the cherry blossoms in spring time, this is a guy who is the director of the fbi recording documents and conversations that he had with the president of the united states in an official capacity, how is that not government material? harris: reporting that four of the memos had markings, making them clearly contained information secret or confidential. we have that conversation with hillary clinton. jason: director comey went up there and said that you do not have to have the markings on there. even if they did, let s pretend that they donate, aga
that he would not get it out, by the way i was very critical of what james 12 did against hillary clinton, going on and off again. sean: let me get greg in the segment. you have been focused and m on e law that says if james comey thought it was obstruction, he had a legal obligation to save immediately. j this was government material he leaked to the new york times. where is his investigation into him, and if heig did it to get a special counsel that ends up being his best friend? and where has james comey ben? under the law, there can be no obstruction of justice because there is no lie, threat, or bribe. but, which is required under the chlaw, but, what about loretta lynch? if she tried to squash this