That does it for the weekend. The sunday morning, can we say happy mothers day . Happy mothers day. I have the other version. You have the other version . I didnt know there were multiples. Happy mothers day to the mommies. To the step mommies to the grand mommies, to the mommy figures. We will see you next saturday. Follow the show on social media. And make sure that you days we got to talk about giving dads the big piece of chicken on fathers day and i think the mommies, they need the big bad backs. Make sure you bring the nice flowers and big backpacks for mothers day. Ive got my flowers and big backpacks. Thats how we are going to do it. Ali is going, what is in the bag . Im sitting here going, i hope someone tidied up will i was at work. My poor mom will be surprised when she gets the big bag that says. What is this about . Anybody over there on your end, want to know how that suit worked out . Two of you are looking at me like, you took the jacket off. I did take the jacket off.
director of policy at the institute of directors. what changes will come into force tomorrow? national insurance, it is only and employers and the self employed will showcase a cut tomorrow. they will get a second tax cut tomorrow after one injanuary. this has taken the ratchet national insurance pay my employees down from 12% last year to 8% effective tomorrow. how much you save in terms of your tax bill will depend on your income, but for the average employee earns about 35,000 average employee earns about 35,000 a year in the uk, taking the chewed macro tax cuts together, you are going to be about £900 a year better off, so it is a meaningful tax cuts, but it is occurring in the context of a big tax increase that has occurred over the last few years. we talked about what the balance of benefits is for employees. what is the impression the position for employers? the the impression the position for employers? employers? the situation there is unchanged- employers?
will be vilified as unwilling to assent into this new orthodoxy? senator, i understand that concern. because there are cases that are addressing these sorts of issues i m not in a position to comment about either my personal views or i m not asking you to. justice alito in the ober filed case wrote that ice and those who cling to the old beliefs will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes, but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labeled as bigots and treated as such by government employers and schools. so the case was decided under a doctrine known as substantive
vilified as unwilling to assent to this new orthodoxy? so, senator, i understand hath concern and because there are cases that are addressing these sorts of issues, i m not in a position to comment about either my personal views or whether and i m not asking you to. justice alito, in the oberfell case says i assume those who cling to the old believes will be able to whisper their thoughts in the recesses of their homes. but if they repeat those views in public, they will risk being labelled as bigots. and treated as such by government employers and schools. and the case, to nerd out with you again, was decided under a doctrine known as substantive