elderly. this plan, $14 a month. why do you think you can offer any kind of any plan in health care for $14 a month. because the government, paying them to do it. it exists because of the medicare and drug part d plan was passed, extension passed a few years ago under the bush administration and the new drug plan gets rid of the donut hole at great cost taxpayers which makes it less costly to the consumer, the person with the health care and lets wal-mart offer $14 health care plans. wal-mart would offer a health care plan if there was no medicare. it would cost about $1,000 a week to have health insurance without government backing thee consume a lot of health care, these people. jonas is saying because of the government s involvement that wal-mart is able to do this. he s dead wrong. three reasons. if you look at the government as an entity they ve said by 2014 they want to go out and try to cut some of the fraud costs they could do it today.
you re sitting in a cafe in cairo, a moderate kid who wants to go to michigan state studying engineering, wait a minute, they are burning the koran over there. why doesn t the president stop this? people think that the president has the power to stop this and if it happens it reflects not just on the idiot pastor down in florida but on the u.s. government at large. a lot in a lot of places, a lot of parts of the world you couldn t do this without government backing. the government would have the power to shut it down. dictatorship. so people view it through that lens. already have you people in afghan, yuk men in afghan throwing rocks and demonstrating against this and throwing rocks at american troop conadvice. it s not a big threat at the moment but it could get even bigger. that s most reasonable compared to what might be coming. here s the pastor. this isn t a new story for us. on august 26th i had pastor jones on, terry jones on, and i thought it was a pretty fair show a
know, very dangerous situations for soldiers on the ground at that time. it always seems like you re a 14-year-old kid and you hear about this. they are burning the koran in the country and you re going to school. what, they burned my bible, they burned my religion? you re sitting in a cafe in cairo, a moderate kid who wants to go to michigan state studying engineering, wait a minute, they are burning the koran over there. why doesn t the president stop this? people think that the president has the power to stop this and if it happens it reflects not just on the idiot pastor down in florida but on the u.s. government at large. a lot in a lot of places, a lot of parts of the world you couldn t do this without government backing. the government would have the power to shut it down. dictatorship. so people view it through that lens. already have you people in afghan, yuk men in afghan throwing rocks and demonstrating against this and throwing rocks at american troop conadvice. i
point. exactly. louise, do you think they can break through to the american public tomorrow on capitol hill with the argument we re already hearing from goldman sachs? that s the struggle for all these investment banks. they did have a duty to their own shareholders but, you know, the question now as we look ahead is given that they were bailed out by the government and enjoyed government backing now, what duty do they have if anything new to the broader society? is there a broader duty they have now because they ve been rescued by the government? well, thank you both. greatly appreciate it. new york times financial reporter as well as vicky ward, vanity fair and cnbc contributor. thank you both. thank you. absolutely. you are looking at brand new video we re just getting in. it was taken the moment a van got flipped by saturday s massive tornado in mississippi. members of the band burning
since then, he says his entire family 30 people in all have disappeared. it s impossible for us to verify their accounts. china prevents independent journalists and human rights organisations from operating freely in xinjiang, where most uighurs live. these pictures from state media show the region as a happy tourist destination. chinese officials call it a place of harmony. but the witnesses who ve come to london to testify at a self styled tribunal will tell a very different story. it has no government backing or legal force, and china has vehemently denounced everyone involved. translation: the so-called uighur special tribunal - is neither legal nor credible. it s just another anti china farce,