possible umbrella here because of this meeting. we know he lied about the fact that the meetingin took place on his national security form. i just filled out one of those for a couple months ago for a case that i had. there s no way that any normal person would read that firm and not know that you d have to report aefr single matter, any too many you appellate with a foreign financial, particularly a russian. now you got a high level of material yalt of why he lied. you gotter yalt and motivate. so he s really in the hot se seat go on quickly. name them what do you see they are? there s treason and the logan act. how is it how is i treason? do you think that s putting the cart ahead of the horse now?