other congressional comittees as well that have been investigating other aspects of the president s behavior that might be considered high crimes and misdemeanors for the purposes of an impeachment proceeding. we ll have more on that in a moment with a leading member of the judiciary committee who s also a part of house leadership overall. but i will tell you as a person who s paid a lot of attention to this story and spent a lot of time absorbing this new material today, here s what i didn t expect out of this impeachment reporting today, what i did expect in laying out everything they found in this impeachment investigation, including the committee, you know, organizing their findings into second one, the president s misconduct and section 2, the president s obstruction of the impeachment inquiry, in seeing them lay out and organize what they found, i guess i should have expected it, but i didn t really get it until i saw it all laid out in this
here s a rabbit that popped out of a hat in today s report from the house intelligence committee on its impeachment investigation. turns out the lead republican member of congress on the intelligence committee that s been doing the impeachment investigation turns out he himself appears to have been involved in the scheme the committee was investigating. there is at the very least this new circumstantial evidence that the top republican congressman on the committee doing this investigation was himself frequently communicating with multiple people involved in this scheme while they were carrying out the scheme. shouldn t congressman devin nunes have had to recuse himself from the investigation? this is like like imagine you re a cop, you re investigating a bank robbery in your town. then it turns out that the bank robber was your roommate and you were on the phone with him
and from people who obviously didn t give their permission. we re going to talk about the evidence the impeachment investigation has obtained and what it might mean in terms of the provability of the claims of the impeachment with our guest chuck rosenberg, who s live here in studio, next. live here in studio, next. ng day, it s the last thing i want to do. well i switched to swiffer wet jet and its awesome. it s an all-in-one so it s ready to go when i am. the cleaning solution actually breaks down dirt and grime. and the pad absorbs it deep inside. so, it prevents streaks and haze better than my old mop. plus, it s safe to use on all my floors, even wood. glad i got that off my chest and the day off my floor. try wet jet with a moneyback guarantee
Transcripts for MSNBC The Rachel Maddow Show 20191204 05:44:30 archive.org - get the latest breaking news, showbiz & celebrity photos, sport news & rumours, viral videos and top stories from archive.org Daily Mail and Mail on Sunday newspapers.
during the heist, right? what would the chief of police do to you if the chief found out that s the circumstance you were in with regard to that bank robbery and you ve been part of the investigation into the bank robbery, right? that would be a problem for you working on that investigation. i doubt you would stay a cop for long. so this is whole new plot point that will presumably have tee be explained. but the whole reason we now have this information is that the impeachment investigation got call records, got phone call records. i m not sure the house was going to get phone records and from people who obviously didn t give their permission. we re going to talk about the evidence the impeachment investigation has obtained and what it might mean in terms of the improvability with chuck rosenberg who s live here in the studio next. rosenberg who s live here in the studio next. man: sneezes