everything else we heard about over the years. nick, what s so surprising is and it starts in the first paragraph, it starts in the lead of your story,er and that is that every time there was an executive at facebook that tried to right wrongs it seems in this story that sheryl sandberg was seething, sheryl sandberg got angry. she was angry when the board was finally told what the truth was. she was angry when an executive began to have concerns and started investigating the extent of russia s interference, of russian agents interference in the democratic process, and she was lashing out at people who were trying to be transparent a year later. it s really amazing. this problem was bubbling up under the surface. they tried to get a handle on it but for a very long time through the election and well after it
nothing remarkable about that. there s tunnel vision. you remember the traumatic event but you often don t remember where you were or who drove you home. this didn t strike me as a super thoughtful perspective. if we look at the actual hearing, the actual questions that happen, there was nothing about it that was a circus like atmosphere. the questions were difficult. it was hard. judge kavanaugh got angry. but nothing like a circus. when people say circus, they re talking about protesters. people are expressing dissatisfaction with the way it is being handled is a krirg us like atmosphere and we don t like that and i don t think that s a good message to be sending people. chasing senators in the hallway is a circus like atmosphere. i m sorry, why did senators not be confront in the hallway? i ll express my opinion and then you can express yours.
a lot to get through. thank you for all those updates on the hill. president trump privately expressed concern after he watched judge brett kavanaugh s interview on fox news this week. let s go to the white house. kaitlyn, what is the concern, that the president does not think he was strong enough in that interview? what is it? pretty much. he believes he appeared too weak during that interview. according to what sources are telling the new york times. you remember that interview. judge brett kavanaugh was emotional. he repeated himself several times. he was pretty calm during it. never got angry. he rebutted these allegations made against him while sitting next to his wife. that s not likely the same response that president trump who himself has been accused of sexual assault more than a dozen times would have taken in response to being accused to something like this. president trump made that disappointment clear yesterday when he heard from him while he was up in new york seat
well, i want to see them do it without the people falling off the rolls. i think there s a way to do both. i don t like the idea we have to do this by april deadline. i want to be very judicious to make sure they don t own a bad bill that the republicans own right now i mean that the democrats own right now. they own obamacare. if trumpcare is going to come in, let s make sure it s substantially better and the american people actually feel the difference. maria cardona, last hour i was speaking to the connecticut governor dan malloy who got angry at me when i suggested the cbo report said, which it does say, that premiums will go down after ten years. it does, in fact, say that premiums will go down 10% after ten years. premiums are a problem. and it is something that does need to be dealt with. but again, it s a choice between lower premiums and something else here. sure. but i would say what happens in the ten years until those premiums go down? what you mentioned, i think, i
prosecuted cases with nice guys who got angry, made a mistake, did one violent thing one night what was that all about? that was to do two things. number one, the prosecutor is hoping this interview will be played to the jury when this case goes to trial, if it does. and he wants to get some information to the jury through his questions. that s obvious. and number two, he thought these questions would get mr. durst talking. you know, this is a very experienced, savvy prosecutor. he s been around for a long time. he s been successful in a number of high-profile cases. and as i said before, mr. durst had nothing to gain by sitting down with him. and the prosecutor should have notified his attorneys before he sat down and asked him a single question. tom mesereau, thanks for your time. appreciate it. thank you. coming up, that russian hack investigation. will it be independent or run by republicans on the congressional intelligence committee? also, does first lady michelle obama h